DK2985_C000 1..28 - AlSharqia Echo Club

Native Aortic Valve 36111. Levine RA, Schwammenthal E. Stenosis is in the eye of theobserver: impact of pressure recovery on assessing aorticvalve area. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41:443–445.12. VanAuker MD, Chandra M, Shirani J, Strom JA. Jet eccentricity:a misleading source of agreement between Doppler/catheter pressure gradients in aortic stenosis. J Am SocEchocardiogr 2001; 14:853–862.13. Cormier B, Iung B, Porte JM et al. Value of multiplane transesophagealechocardiography in determining aortic valve areain aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77:882–885.14. Arsenault M, Masani N, Magni G et al. Variation of anatomicvalve area during ejection in patients with valvularaortic stenosis evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiographicplanimetry: comparison with traditional Dopplerdata. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32:1931–1937.15. Perrino AC Jr, Harris SN, Luther MA. Intraoperative determinationof cardiac output using multiplane transesophagealechocardiography: a comparison to thermodilution.Anesthesiology 1998; 89:350–357.16. Maslow AD, Haering JM, Heindel S et al. An evaluation ofprosthetic aortic valves using transesophageal echocardiography:the double-envelope technique. Anesth Analg2000; 91:509–516.17. Maslow AD, Mashikian J, Haering JM et al. Transesophagealechocardiographic evaluation of native aortic valvearea: utility of the double-envelope technique. J CardiothoracVasc Anesth 2001; 15:293–299.18. Kim CJ, Berglund H, Nishioka T et al. Correspondence ofaortic valve area determination from transesophageal echocardiography,transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiaccatheterization. Am Heart J 1996; 132:1163–1172.19. Bernard Y, Meneveau N, Vuillemenot A et al. Planimetryof aortic valve area using multiplane transoesophagealechocardiography is not a reliable method for assessingseverity of aortic stenosis. Heart 1997; 78:68–73.20. Tardif JC, Miller DS, Pandian NG et al. Effects of variationsin flow on aortic valve area in aortic stenosis based on in vivoplanimetry of aortic valve area by multiplane transesophagealechocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:193–198.21. Tardif JC, Rodrigues AG, Hardy JF et al. Simultaneousdetermination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formulaand by transesophageal echocardiography under differenttransvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomicaortic valve area does not change with variations in flowin aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29:1296–1302.22. Schöbel WA, Voelker W, Haase KK, Karsch KR. Extent,determinants and clinical importance of pressure recoveryin patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 1999;20:1355–1363.23. Rahimtoola SH. “Prophylactic” valve replacement for mildaortic valve disease at time of surgery for other cardiovasculardisease?... No. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:2009–2015.24. Kerut EK, McIlwain EF, Plotnick GD. Handbook of Echo-Doppler Interpretation. Armonk, NY: Futura Pub, 1996.25. Tirone ED. Remodeling the aortic root and preservation ofthe native aortic valve. Oper Tech Card Thorac Surg 1996;1:44–56.26. Movsowitz HD, Levine RA, Hilgenberg AD, IsselbacherEM. Transesophageal echocardiographic description ofthe mechanisms of aortic regurgitation in acute type Aaortic dissection: implications for aortic valve repair.J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:884–890.27. Perry GJ, Helmcke F, Nanda NC et al. Evaluation of aorticinsufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. J Am CollCardiol 1987; 9:952–959.28. Oh JK, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. The Echo Manual. 2nd ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999.29. Evangelista A, del Castillo HG, Calvo F et al. Strategy foroptimal aortic regurgitation quantification by Dopplerechocardiography: agreement among different methods.Am Heart J 2000; 139:773–781.30. Ozkan M, Ozdemir N, Kaymaz C et al. Measurement ofaortic valve anatomic regurgitant area using transesophagealechocardiography: implications for the quantitationof aortic regurgitation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002;15:1170–1174.31. Tribouilloy CM, Enriquez-Sarano M, Fett SL et al.Application of the proximal flow convergence method tocalculate the effective regurgitant orifice area in aorticregurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32:1032–1039.32. Sato Y, Kawazoe K, Nasu M, Hiramori K. Clinical usefulnessof the proximal isovelocity surface area method usingechocardiography in patients with eccentric aortic regurgitation.J Heart Valve Dis 1999; 8:104–111.33. Kim YJ, Jones M, Shiota T et al. Effect of load alterationson the effective regurgitant orifice area in chronic aorticregurgitation. Heart 2002; 88:397–400.34. Ishii M, Jones M, Shiota T et al. Quantifying aortic regurgitationby using the color Doppler-imaged vena contracta:a chronic animal model study. Circulation 1997; 96:2009–2015.35. Willett DL, Hall SA, Jessen ME et al. Assessment of aorticregurgitation by transesophageal color Doppler imaging ofthe vena contracta: validation against an intraoperativeaortic flow probe. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1450–1455.36. Eren M, Eksik A, Gorgulu S et al. Determination of venacontracta and its value in evaluating severity of aorticregurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis 2002; 11:567–575.37. Tribouilloy CM, Enriquez-Sarano M, Bailey KR et al.Assessment of severity of aortic regurgitation using thewidth of the vena contracta: a clinical color Dopplerimaging study. Circulation 2000; 102:558–564.38. Obeid AI. Echocardiography in Clinical Practice.Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company, 1992.39. Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E et al.Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of nativevalvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Dopplerechocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003;16:777–802.