13.07.2015 Views

in Albania - Instituti i Shendetit Publik

in Albania - Instituti i Shendetit Publik

in Albania - Instituti i Shendetit Publik

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ALBANIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTQuality improvement efforts at the National Instituteof Public Health of KosovoValbona Zhjeqi 1 , Naser Ramadani 1 , R<strong>in</strong>a Hoxha 1 , Sanije Gashi 1 , Ilir Begolli 1 ,Drita Salihu 1 , Merita Berisha 11National Institute of Public Health, Prist<strong>in</strong>e, Kosovo.Aim: The aim of this research work was to assessusers satisfaction with the quality of health servicesprovided at the National Institute of Public Health(NIPH) and the Regional Institutes of Public Health(RIPH) <strong>in</strong> Kosovo.Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey. Studypopulation consisted of clients/users of the IPHsat both regional and national level. An anonymousquestionnaire (ten items organized <strong>in</strong> three doma<strong>in</strong>s)was adm<strong>in</strong>istered to all participants.Results: The study <strong>in</strong>volved 397 <strong>in</strong>dividuals: 217(55%) women and 180 (45%) men. Mean age ofthe respondents was 38.3 years. Access to the IPHwas not identified as a problem s<strong>in</strong>ce only 28 (7.1%)<strong>in</strong>dividuals reported not so easy access . Aproblem which was identified, concerns the fact thatusers do not know where to do a compla<strong>in</strong>t aga<strong>in</strong>stthe IPH. Of the 397 users, only 45.8% consideredpositively the overall quality of services provided atthe IPHs. Clients <strong>in</strong> Prist<strong>in</strong>e rema<strong>in</strong> the most criticalusers: 91% of them stated that they do not knowwhere to compla<strong>in</strong>, followed by the RPH <strong>in</strong> Ferizaj(64%). Among quality components, 12 of themwere evaluated and scored with an average markof 3.7. Compar<strong>in</strong>g average marks of the RIPH,Ferizaj RIPH was graded with the lowest mark (3.2),whereas Gjilan RIPH was rated with the highestgrade (4.3).Conclusion: Patients were generally satisfied withaccess to IPH. A problem, however, was the factthat patients did not know where to submit acompla<strong>in</strong>t, mostly <strong>in</strong> Prist<strong>in</strong>e and Ferizaj. Patientsevaluated the quality of health services with anaverage mark (3.7). Conversely, the courtesy of thestaff was rated with the highest grade (4.5) whereashygiene with the lowest grade (3.3).Keywords: evaluation, <strong>in</strong>stituteof publichealth, Kosovo, quality, satisfaction.62 ALBANIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!