A Wordnet from the Ground Up

174 Chapter 5. Polish WordNet Today and Tomorrow{bok ‘side’, krawędź ‘edge’, skraj ‘brink’, kraj ‘brink’, kant‘edge’, brzeg ‘margin’, obrzeże ‘margin’}{dobra strona ‘good side’, plus ‘plus’, cnota ‘virtue’, walor‘value’, pozytyw ‘positive’, przymiot ‘attribute’, wartość‘value’, zaleta ‘advantage’}{finanse ‘finances’, fundusz ‘fund’, kapitał ‘capital’, budżet‘budget’, środki finansowe ‘financial means’, fundusze ‘funds’}{grób ‘grave’, mogiła ‘grave’, grobowiec ‘thomb’, nagrobek‘gravestone’, miejsce pochówku ‘place of burial’}{istota ‘essence’, sens ‘sens’, sedno ‘core’, główne zagadnienie‘main issue’, meritum ‘crux’, kwintensencja ‘quintessence’, jądro‘gist’}{nierozdzielność ‘inseparability’, nierozerwalność‘indissolubility’, jednolitość ‘uniformity’, spoistość‘cohesiveness’, nierozłączność ‘inseparability’, jedność ‘unity’,spójność ‘cohession’}The verbal and adjectival synsets are more diverse in size (Table 5.5), but it shouldbe emphasised that the verbal part has been only expanded a little, and the adjectivalpart is the same as in the core plWordNet. The numbers of synsets and LUs are muchsmaller than for the nominal part, so a lot of the more specific LUs have not beenadded yet.Percentage of lemmas belonging to the n synsets [%]1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ≥ 10Nouns 76.70 17.68 3.88 1.08 0.38 0.18 0.07 0.03 0.00 0.00Verbs 79.41 14.87 4.03 1.23 0.29 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Adjectives 72.99 15.90 6.56 2.66 1.10 0.08 0.23 0.15 0.15 0.18Table 5.6: The number of synsets to which a lemma belongsTable 5.6 presents a more detailed picture of the lemma polysemy. The numbers ofmonosemous lemmas appear in Table 5.3. Here they are expressed as the percentagesin the first column. It is worth noticing that the percentage of monosemous nominallemmas is lower than for the other two categories, in contrast with the much higher