A Wordnet from the Ground Up

List of Figures2.1 The LU perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392.2 The synset perspective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 413.1 Examples of WBST+H questions for plWordNet 1.0 . . . . . . . . . . 553.2 Examples of nominal QA pairs generated from different versions ofplWordNet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 553.3 Example of the difference between EWBST and WBST QA pairs . . . 593.4 Examples of QA pairs with detractors generated from different versionsof plWordNet for the same QA pair . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 603.5 Parts of a lexico-morphosyntactic constraint which describes nominalLUs via adjectival modification (AdjC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 683.6 Parts of a morphosyntactic constraint which describes nominal LUs viathe modification by a nominal LU in the genitive case (NmgC) . . . . . 694.1 The essentials of the JestInst pattern implementation in JOSKIPI . . . 1054.2 The essentials of the TakichJak pattern implementation in JOSKIPI . . 1064.3 Examples of LU pairs extracted from the joint corpus by all threelexico-morphosyntactic patterns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1094.4 Examples of LU pairs extracted by different lexico-morphosyntacticpatterns from the joint corpus (C – correct, I – incorrect) . . . . . . . 1104.5 Examples of hypernymy instances extracted by Estratto, version EST+nm1284.6 Example results of the classification of LU pairs acquired from plWord-Net as relevant (near-synonyms and close hypernyms) and not relevant.The classifier was C4.5, the positive to negative ratio 1:10; manuallyprepared negative examples were used together with automatically generatedexamples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1404.7 Example results of the classification of LU pairs not present in plWord-Net (at the time of the test) as relevant (near-synonyms and close hypernyms)and not relevant. The classifier was C4.5, the positive tonegative ratio 1:10; manually prepared negative examples were usedtogether with automatically generated examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142209