A Wordnet from the Ground Up

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bibliography 195Derwojedowa, Magdalena, Maciej Piasecki, Stanisław Szpakowicz and Magdalena Zawisławska.(2008) “plWordNet – The Polish Wordnet”. Online access to the databaseof plWordNet: www.plwordnet.pwr.wroc.pl.Derwojedowa, Magdalena, Maciej Piasecki, Stanisław Szpakowicz, Magdalena Zawisławskaand Bartosz Broda. (2008) “Words, concepts and relations in the constructionof Polish WordNet”. Tanács et al. (2008), 162–177.Derwojedowa, Magdalena and Michał Rudolf. (2003) “Czy Burkina to dziewczynai co o tym sądzą ich królewskie mości, czyli o jednostkach leksykalnych pewnegotypu [... on certain type of lexical units]”. Poradnik Językowy 5/2003: 37–49.Derwojedowa, Magdalena, Stanisław Szpakowicz, Magdalena Zawisławska and MaciejPiasecki. (2008) “Lexical units as the centrepiece of a wordnet”. Kłopotek et al.(2008), 351–357.Derwojedowa, Magdalena and Magdalena Zawisławska. (2007a) “Relacje leksykalnew polskiej i czeskiej bazie wordnet [Lexical relations in the Polish and Czech wordnets]”.Z Polskich Studiów Slawistycznych Seria XI, Językoznawstwo: 15–23.. (2007b) “Relacje leksykalne w polskiej i czeskiej bazie wordnet [Lexical relationsin the Polish and Czech wordnets]”. Z Polskich Studiów Slawistycznych SeriaXI, Językoznawstwo: 15–23.Derwojedowa, Magdalena, Magdalena Zawisławska, Maciej Piasecki and Stanisław Szpakowicz.(2007) “Relacje w polskim WordNecie [Relations in Polish WordNet]”.Report, the PREPRINTY Series 1, Institute of Applied Informatics, Wrocław Universityof Technology. URL http://plwordnet.pwr.wroc.pl/main/content/files/publications/relacje_v5rc02.pdfDorr, Bonnie J. (1997) “Large-scale dictionary construction for foreign language tutoringand interlingual machine translation”. Machine Translation 12(1): 1–55. URLftp://ftp.umiacs.umd.edu/pub/bonnie/icall-97.psDubisz, Stanisław, ed. (2004) Uniwersalny słownik języka polskiego [Universal Dictionaryof Polish Language], electronic version 0.1. PWN.Dunning, Ted. (1993) “Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence”.Computational Linguistics 191: 61–74.Edmonds, Philip and Graeme Hirst. (2002) “Near-synonymy and lexical choice”. ComputationalLinguistics 28(2): 105–144.Fellbaum, Christiane. (1998a) “A semantic network of English: The mother of allWordNets”. Computers and the Humanities 32: 209–220.. (1998b) A semantic network of English verbs., Fellbaum (1998c)., chapter 3,69–104., ed. (1998c) WordNet – an electronic lexical database. The MIT Press.
196 BibliographyFellbaum, Christiane and Piek Vossen. (2007) “Connecting the universal to the specific:Towards the global grid”. Toru Ishida et al., ed., Intercultural Collaboration: FirstInternational Workshop. New York: Springer, 1–16.Firth, John Rupert. (1957) “A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930-55”. Studies inLinguistic Analysis (special volume of the Philological Society): 1–32 Oxford, ThePhilological Society.Fleiss, Joseph L. (1971) “Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters”.Psychological Bulletin 76(5): 378–382.Forster, Richard. (2006) Document clustering in large German corpora using naturallanguage processing. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Zurich.Francis, Winthrop Nelson and Henry Kučera. (1982) Frequency analysis of Englishusage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Freitag, Dayne, Matthias Blume, John Byrnes, Edmond Chow, Sadik Kapadia, RichardRohwer and Zhiqiang Wang. (2005) “New experiments in distributional representationsof synonymy”. Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Computational NaturalLanguage Learning. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Association for Computational Linguistics,25–32.Fromkin, Victoria, Bruce Hayes, Susan Curtiss, Anna Szabolcsi, Tim Stowell, EdwardStabler, Dominique Sportiche, Hilda Koopman, Patricia A. Keating, Pamela Munro,Nina Hyams and Donca Steriade. (2000) Linguistics: An introduction to linguistictheory. Blackwell Publishing.Fukumoto, Fumiyo and Yoshimi Suzuki. (2001) “Learning lexical representation fortext categorization”. Proceedings of the NAACL 2001 Workshop on WordNet andOther Lexical Resources, 156–161. URL http://www.seas.smu.edu/~rada/mwnw/papers/WNW-NAACL-232.pdf.gzGeffet, Maayan and Ido Dagan. (2004) “Vector quality and distributional similarity”.Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Committee on ComputationalLinguistics, 247–254.Girju, Roxana, Adriana Badulescu and Dan Moldovan. (2006) “Automatic discoveryof part-whole relations”. Computational Linguistics 32(1): 83–135.Gonzalo, Julio, Felisa Verdejo, Irina Chugur and Juan Cigarran. (1998) “Indexingwith WordNet synsets can improve text retrieval”. Proceedings of the COL-ING/ACL Workshop on Usage of WordNet in Natural Language Processing Systems,38–44. URL http://www.ai.sri.com/~harabagi/coling-acl98/acl_work/julio.ps.gzGraliński, Filip. (2005) “A simple CF formalism and free word order”. Archives ofControl Sciences 15(LI)(3): 541–554.
Page 1 and 2:
A Wordnetfrom the Ground Up
Page 3 and 4:
Work financed by the Polish Ministr
Page 7 and 8:
6 Prefaceheartfelt thanks go to all
Page 9:
8 Chapter 1. Motivation, Goals, Ear
Page 12 and 13:
1.1. Motivation 11[a] special form
Page 14 and 15:
1.1. Motivation 13Affect (Strappara
Page 16 and 17:
1.2. The Goals of the plWordNet Pro
Page 18 and 19:
1.2. The Goals of the plWordNet Pro
Page 20 and 21:
1.3. Early Decisions 19Merge Model:
Page 22:
1.3. Early Decisions 214. On the ot
Page 25 and 26:
24 Chapter 2. Building a Wordnet Co
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
48 Chapter 3. Discovering Semantic
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
102 Chapter 4. Extracting Relation
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146: 144 Chapter 4. Extracting Relation
Page 167 and 168: 166 Chapter 5. Polish WordNet Today
Page 186 and 187: Appendix ATests for Lexico-semantic
Page 188 and 189: 187Test for adjectives (T. IX)1. p1
Page 190 and 191: 189RelatednessTest for nouns (T. XV
Page 192 and 193: BibliographyAgarwal, Abhaya and Alo
Page 194 and 195: Bibliography 193on Deep Lexical Acq
Page 198 and 199: Bibliography 197Grefenstette, Grego
Page 200 and 201: Bibliography 199Kurc, Roman. (2008)
Page 202 and 203: Bibliography 201Mohammad, Saif and
Page 204 and 205: Bibliography 203. (2006) “The pot
Page 206 and 207: Bibliography 205and Technology 7(1-
Page 208 and 209: List of Tables2.1 The size of the c
Page 210 and 211: List of Figures2.1 The LU perspecti
Page 212 and 213: List of Figures 2114.16 Completely
Page 214 and 215: Index 213CBC, see Clustering by Com
Page 216 and 217: Index 215169, 177, 178, 180, 182hyp
Page 218 and 219: Index 217mutual hypernymy, 24Mutual
Page 220 and 221: Index 219SUMO, 14Supported Vector M
Page 222: A language without a wordnet is at
show all

A Wordnet from the Ground Up

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?