A Wordnet from the Ground Up

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bibliography 201Mohammad, Saif and Graeme Hirst. (2006) “Distributional measures as proxies forsemantic relatedness”. Submitted for publication in Kluwer. URL http://ftp.cs.toronto.edu/pub/gh/Mohammad+Hirst-2005.pdfMohanty, Rajat Kumar, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, Shraddha Kalele, Prabhakar Pandey,Aditya Sharma and Mitesh Kopra. (2008) “Synset based multilingual dictionary:Insights, applications and challenges”. Tanács et al. (2008), 321–333.Moldovan, Dan I. and Rada Mihalcea. (2000) “Using WordNet and lexical operatorsto improve internet searches”. IEEE Internet Computing 4(1): 34–43. URL http://www.seas.smu.edu/~rada/papers/int-comp.99.ps.gzMorato, Jorge, Miguel Ángel Marzal, Juan Lloréns and José Moreiro. (2004) “WordNetApplications”. Proceedings of the Second Global WordNet Conference, 270–278.URL http://www.fi.muni.cz/gwc2004/proc/105.pdfMorin, Emmanuel and Christian Jacquemin. (1999) “Projecting corpus-based semanticlinks on a thesaurus”. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Associationfor Computational Linguistics, 389–396.. (2004) “Automatic acquisition and expansion of hypernym links”. Computerand the Humanities 38(4): 343–362.Niles, Ian and Adam Pease. (2001) “Towards a standard upper ontology”. Chris Weltyand Barry Smith, ed., Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on FormalOntology in Information Systems. Ogunquit, Maine, 2–9.Obrębski, Tomasz. (2002) Automatyczna analiza składniowa języka polskiego z wykorzystaniemgramatyki zależnościowej [Automatic syntactic analysis of Polish usinga dependency grammar]. Ph. D. dissertation, Instytut Podstaw Informatyki PAN.Pala, Karel and Pavel Smrž. (2004) “Building Czech Wordnet”. Romanian Journal ofInformation Science and Technology 7(1–2): 79–88.Palmer, Martha, Daniel Gildea and Paul Kingsbury. (2005) “The proposition bank:A corpus annotated with semantic roles”. Computational Linguistics 31(1): 71–106.Pantel, Patrick. (2003) Clustering by committee. Ph. D. dissertation, Department ofComputing Science, University of Alberta. Adviser-Dekang Lin.Pantel, Patrick and Marco Pennacchiotti. (2006) “Esspresso: Leveraging genericpatterns for automatically harvesting semantic relations”. Calzolari et al. (2006),113–120.Pantel, Patrick and Deepak Ravichandran. (2004) “Automatically labeling semanticclasses”. Daniel Marcu Susan Dumais and Salim Roukos, ed., Proceedings of theHuman Language Technology Conference / Annual Meeting of the North AmericanChapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Boston, Massachusetts,USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 321–328.
202 BibliographyPantel, Patrick, Deepak Ravichandran and Eduard Hovy. (2004) “Towards terascaleknowledge acquisition”. Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the InternationalCommittee on Computational Linguistics. Geneva, Switzerland, 771–777. URL http://www.patrickpantel.com/cgi-bin/Web/Tools/getfile.pl?type=paper&id=2004/coling04.pdfPedersen, Bolette Sandford and Sanni Nimb. (2008) “Event hierarchies in DanNet”.Tanács et al. (2008), 339–348.Pedersen, Ted. (2006) “Unsupervised corpus based methods for WSD”. Agirre and Edmonds(2006), 133–166.Piasecki, Maciej. (2006) “Handmade and automatic rules for Polish tagger”. Sojkaet al. (2006), 205–212.Piasecki, Maciej and Bartosz Broda. (2007) “Semantic similarity measure of polishnouns based on linguistic features”. Witold Abramowicz, ed., Proceedings of the10th International Conference on Business Information Systems. Springer, 381–390.Piasecki, Maciej and Grzegorz Godlewski. (2006) “Effective architecture of the Polishtagger”. Sojka et al. (2006), 213–220.Piasecki, Maciej and Paweł Koczan. (2007) “Environment supporting construction ofthe Polish WordNet”. Vetulani (2007), 519–523.Piasecki, Maciej, Michał Marcińczuk, Stanisław Szpakowicz and Bartosz Broda. (2008)“Classification-based filtering of semantic relatedness in hypernymy extraction”. Proceedingsof the Sixth International Conference on Natural Language Processing –GoTAL 2008. Springer, 393–404.Piasecki, Maciej and Adam Radziszewski. (2009) “Morphosyntactic constraints inacquisition of linguistic knowledge for Polish”. Agnieszka Mykowiecka and MałgorzataMarciniak, ed., Aspects of Natural Language Processing. Springer, 163–190.Accepted, volume in preparation. Essays dedicated to Professor Leonard Bolc.Piasecki, Maciej, Stanisław Szpakowicz and Bartosz Broda. (2007a) “Automatic selectionof heterogeneous syntactic features in semantic similarity of Polish nouns”.Proceedings of the Text, Speech and Dialog Conference. Springer, 66–75.. (2007b) “Extended similarity test for the evaluation of semantic similarityfunctions”. Vetulani (2007), 104–108.Piotrowski, Tadeusz and Zygmunt Saloni. (1999) Kieszonkowy słownik angielsko-polskii polsko-angielski [Pocket English-Polish and Polish-English Dictionary]. Warszawa:Wyd. Wilga.Przepiórkowski, Adam. (2004) The IPI PAN Corpus, preliminary version. Institute ofComputer Science PAS.
Page 1 and 2:
A Wordnetfrom the Ground Up
Page 3 and 4:
Work financed by the Polish Ministr
Page 7 and 8:
6 Prefaceheartfelt thanks go to all
Page 9:
8 Chapter 1. Motivation, Goals, Ear
Page 12 and 13:
1.1. Motivation 11[a] special form
Page 14 and 15:
1.1. Motivation 13Affect (Strappara
Page 16 and 17:
1.2. The Goals of the plWordNet Pro
Page 18 and 19:
1.2. The Goals of the plWordNet Pro
Page 20 and 21:
1.3. Early Decisions 19Merge Model:
Page 22:
1.3. Early Decisions 214. On the ot
Page 25 and 26:
24 Chapter 2. Building a Wordnet Co
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
48 Chapter 3. Discovering Semantic
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
102 Chapter 4. Extracting Relation
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152: 150 Chapter 4. Extracting Relation
Page 167 and 168: 166 Chapter 5. Polish WordNet Today
Page 186 and 187: Appendix ATests for Lexico-semantic
Page 188 and 189: 187Test for adjectives (T. IX)1. p1
Page 190 and 191: 189RelatednessTest for nouns (T. XV
Page 192 and 193: BibliographyAgarwal, Abhaya and Alo
Page 194 and 195: Bibliography 193on Deep Lexical Acq
Page 196 and 197: Bibliography 195Derwojedowa, Magdal
Page 198 and 199: Bibliography 197Grefenstette, Grego
Page 200 and 201: Bibliography 199Kurc, Roman. (2008)
Page 204 and 205: Bibliography 203. (2006) “The pot
Page 206 and 207: Bibliography 205and Technology 7(1-
Page 208 and 209: List of Tables2.1 The size of the c
Page 210 and 211: List of Figures2.1 The LU perspecti
Page 212 and 213: List of Figures 2114.16 Completely
Page 214 and 215: Index 213CBC, see Clustering by Com
Page 216 and 217: Index 215169, 177, 178, 180, 182hyp
Page 218 and 219: Index 217mutual hypernymy, 24Mutual
Page 220 and 221: Index 219SUMO, 14Supported Vector M
Page 222: A language without a wordnet is at
show all

A Wordnet from the Ground Up

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?