06.08.2015 Views

A Wordnet from the Ground Up

A Wordnet from the Ground Up - School of Information Technology ...

A Wordnet from the Ground Up - School of Information Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.4. Measures of Semantic Relatedness 71features was also discussed in (Lapata, 2001, Boleda et al., 2004, 2005), but applied in<strong>the</strong> semantic classification of adjectives. We have identified three types of constraintsas <strong>the</strong> potential semantic descriptors of adjectives:ANmod – an occurrence of a particular noun as modified by <strong>the</strong> given adjective,AAdv – an adverb in close proximity to <strong>the</strong> given adjective,AA – <strong>the</strong> co-occurrence with an adjective that agrees on case, number and gender asa potential co-constituent of <strong>the</strong> same noun phrase.ANmod is symmetrical to <strong>the</strong> AdjC constraint used for nominal LUs, but this timelexical elements are nouns instead of adjectives. AAdv is very similar to VAdv: lexicalelements are adverbs and we test <strong>the</strong> presence of an adverb in a distance not greaterthan 2. The implementation of AA, where lexical elements are adjectival LUs, hasbeen based on <strong>the</strong> scheme of ANmod, but we are looking for an occurrences of ano<strong>the</strong>radjectival LU which agrees on case, number and gender and which can be a co-modifierof <strong>the</strong> same nominal LU.The latter feature was advocated by Hatzivassiloglou and McKeown (1993) asexpressing negative semantic information: only unrelated adjectives can sit in <strong>the</strong> samenoun phrase. Our corpus data (collected <strong>from</strong> IPIC), however, suggest that it is toostrong a bias. In addition, our AA constraint also accepts coordination of adjectives,and <strong>the</strong>n related adjectives can co-occur in a noun phrase. In <strong>the</strong> end, we used <strong>the</strong>AA feature in a positive way, just like <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r features. Features of all three types,weighted and filtered by <strong>the</strong> RWF weight function discussed in Section 3.4.4, wereused in <strong>the</strong> discovery of contexts of occurrences of particular adjectives.The AA constraint was applied in two different ways:• as part of a joint large matrix toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> two o<strong>the</strong>r constraints: differentparts (columns) of row vectors generated by different constraints, but <strong>the</strong> matrixprocessed as a whole – this usage is encoded ANmod+AAdv+AA in Table 3.13,• two separate matrices were created: one joint for ANmod+AAdv and ano<strong>the</strong>rfor AA only.In <strong>the</strong> second situation, <strong>the</strong> semantic relatedness values were calculated separatelyon <strong>the</strong> basis of both matrices separately processed and next linearly combined (Brodaet al., 2008):MSR Adj (l 1 , l 2 ) =α MSR ANmod+AAdv (l 1 , l 2 ) + β MSR AA (l 1 , l 2 )(3.5)The values of <strong>the</strong> coefficients were selected experimentally; α = β = 0.5 gave <strong>the</strong>best results.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!