Box 2.2: Dynamics and evacuation patternsassociated with rapid-onset hazardsNational and local authorities have the primary responsibilityfor implementing evacuations as a protective measure.Given that fleeing quickly from the dangers inherent ina rapidly unfolding disaster can be highly risky, especiallywhen large numbers of people are involved, such evacuationsshould be well prepared for in advance, including theidentification of safe refuge areas.People with limited mobility because of age, illness ordisability or sickness, and children who become separatedfrom their carers require particular attention to ensure thatthey are adequately protected. 24Evacuations are normally undertaken on the assumptionthat they will be short-lived, but return depends on the effectsof a disaster in home areas and prospects for recovery. Torespect human rights and be lawful, authorities must ensurethe safety and health of those affected or at risk, and allmeasures must be taken to minimise the scale and durationof displacement and its adverse effects. 25Well-executed evacuations of people living in exposed areasare a vital life-saving measure. 26 Governments worldwidehave recognised the importance of effective early warningsystems to monitor threats and ensure that timely notice isgiven to all those potentially exposed. 27 Evacuations mustalso take into account the nature of different hazards, whichdo much to determine the timing and dynamics of initialdisplacement patterns.In the case of tropical storms, evacuations tend to takeplace over the hours and sometimes days before they areexpected to make landfall, and/or over similar timescalesafterwards. The onset of hurricanes and cyclones can be predictedin time to allow for prior large-scale evacuations, butthey may change strength and direction at the last minute.Tornadoes often develop with little warning, so shelteringin situ, often underground, tends to be the safest option. Insuch cases, people can still become displaced in the storm’saftermath if they lose their homes or the devastation to theircommunities is so widespread that they are forced to moveelsewhere, at least temporarily.Tsunami warnings provide exposed populations with vitaltime to flee to higher ground. This may be a matter of minutesto hours, depending on how close they are to an underseaearthquake’s epicentre. 28 Earthquakes and flash floods givelittle or no notice of their onset, meaning that evacuationstake place during or after their initial impact. In contrast, earlywarnings of volcanic activity often allow people to evacuateunder less time pressure, but the exact moment of an eruptionis difficult to predict. This may mean that evacuees aredisplaced for weeks, or that they are allowed to return onlyto be evacuated again at a later date.Periods of heavy seasonal rainfall and riverine and stormrelatedfloods often affect heavily populated low-lying andcoastal areas. As they evolve, they may prompt successivewaves of evacuations over weeks and months, which alsomakes it difficult to distinguish between one disaster and thenext. We identified examples of all these dynamics amongthe displacements reported in 2014, the largest of which inboth absolute and relative terms are discussed in sectionfour.question. The human exploitation andmismanagement of the planet’s naturalresources is an important factor in manydisasters. The decision to dam or divertwater in response to heavy rainfall andflood risk may have immediate impacts ondisplacement, for example. In slowly developingand long-lasting situations, it is lesslikely that a specific hazard can be singledout as the main driver of displacement(see Afghanistan spotlight in section four).Models developed by IDMC and ClimateInteractive also show that the frequencyof drought in the Horn of Africa is a lesssignificant factor in undermining pastoralists’livelihoods and driving their displacementthan other issues, such as changesin government policy. 20 Emphasising thenatural aspect of hazards distracts fromthe role of human activity in the disastersand displacement they cause. 21 As such,an over-emphasis on hazards themselvescan be politically, practically and methodologicallyproblematic.At the same time, anthropogenic climatechange is expected to increasethe intensity and frequency of certainweather-related hazards and the vulnerabilityof some populations as their landand livelihoods become uninhabitable. 22The best scientific knowledge availablemakes clear the urgency of action to bothmitigate global warming and adapt to itshuman impacts, including displacement. 23The complex relationship betweenslow-onset hazards and displacement associatedwith climate change is discussedfurther in box 2.1.Patterns of movementFollowing their initial displacement,people’s trajectories are often complex,a fact seen at both the individualand community level, and within andamong households. It is not unusual fordisplaced people to move a number oftimes, whether in response to threats oropportunities that arise over time as theyseek to end the insecurity and uncertaintyof their displacement and re-establishtheir homes and livelihoods. The abilityto move to where assistance is availablemay indicate resilience. Governments andhumanitarian organisations may relocatepeople from initial shelter sites or evacuationcentres to more secure shelter whenit becomes clearer that displacement islikely to last longer than expected.Movements in response to new threatsto their safety and security in their placesof refuge, however, may constitute secondarydisplacement. Threats may includeexposure to further natural hazardsas a camp becomes flooded, for example,or through exposure to gender-based violenceor forced eviction. Chronic displacement,whether long-lasting, in repeatedcycles or both, undermines people’s resilienceand makes them more vulnerableover time. 2916 Global <strong>Estimates</strong> 2015
Repeated and frequent displacementRepeated cycles of displacement arefrequently observed in countries andareas exposed to natural hazards (seemaps in section 3 for example). Contraryto common assumptions, the early returnof people to their homes does not necessarilyindicate the end of their displacement.If recovery is beyond the means ofdisplaced families and the risk of furtherdisaster and displacement is not reduced,it does not constitute a safe and sustainablesolution.Long-lasting and protracteddisplacementLong-lasting and protracted displacementfollowing disasters, especially rapidonsetdisasters, is more prevalent thancommonly assumed 30 as shown by evidencepresented in section 5 and annex Cof this report. At the same time, the globaldata presented in this report does not followthe hundreds of new displacementsidentified each year to track how longpeople remain displaced for, what theirneeds are during displacement nor whatobstacles they face to achieving durablesolutions. Knowledge about the durationof displacement following disasters is adhoc and unconsolidated, as is more detailedidentification and analysis of casesof particular concern. 31 This constitutesan important gap that we have started toaddress more systematically as discussedin section 5.Definitions of protracted displacementvary across different organisations andperspectives and depend on the purposeand context in which the term is applied.They commonly include an element oftime as well as a notion of limbo or uncertaintyfor people facing significantobstacles to achieving solutions to theirdisplacement and for whom progress isslow or stalled. 32 The length of time thatpeople remain displaced can vary greatlyaccording to the specific context, andthresholds applied for the purpose of statisticalanalysis or research will tend to bearbitrary. 33 UNHCR data on displacementrelated to conflict applies the term to situationsthat have been ongoing for at leastfive years, 34 though it may be argued thatmany situations become protracted beforethat point. Length of time displaced isinsufficient in itself as an indicator of theseverity of the situation. For the purposeof the preliminary research presented inthis report, we have used a temporal valueto set the parameters of our analysis. Theminimum duration of one year was appliedas a timeframe commonly assumedfor the emergency response phase followingrapid-onset disaster, and withinwhich displaced people are expected tohave returned to their homes. This andother assumptions are also discussed insection 5.Displacement in terms of distancemovedThe distance people flee from theirhomes should not be taken as an indicatorof the severity of people’s situationswhile displaced. How far they move is determinedby a variety of factors, includingwhether areas near their homes are safeand accessible, and best able to accessassistance, be it from family and friends,the government or other providers.Staying as close to their homes aspossible is a common strategy that enablesdisplaced people to maintain theirsocial networks, protect their propertyand register their need for emergencyassistance. It may also, however, be theresult of a lack of better options or becausephysical, financial, social or politicalobstacles prevent them from moving furtherafield. 35 People in such situations arein essence both displaced and trapped, 36and as such they should be among thoseincluded for humanitarian assistance andprotection, particularly in the aftermathof a disaster that has caused significantdestruction.Internal and cross-border displacementThe vast majority of people who fleedisasters remain within their country ofresidence. As set out in the Guiding Principleson Internal Displacement, they aredescribed as internally displaced people(IDPs). 37 At the same time, in some regionssubstantial numbers of displacedpeople seek protection and assistanceabroad. 38 The global data on which thisreport is based covers only the incidenceof displacement, and not where displacedpeople flee to or where they eventuallysettle. As such, it does not allow us toquantify how many people may havecrossed an international border duringtheir displacement or how many settleabroad. Evidence gathered by the NansenInitiative on cross-border displacementis strongest for people displaced acrossborders in Africa in relation to droughtand floods, and in the Americas in relationto earthquakes and hurricanes inparticular. Examples from Asia are morerare, though disasters and environmentaldegradation have been linked to peoplemigrating abroad (see the case in section5 from Bangladesh). Little evidencehas been found of such displacementor migration from Europe. 39 As sea levelscontinue to rise it is expected thata significant portion of the populationsof small island countries and low-lyingcountries with extensive coastlines willbe forced to move abroad also. 40A durable solution to displacementis achieved a) when IDPs have found asettlement option through re-establishingtheir homes where they lived before thedisaster, through integrating locally in theareas where they have been displacedto, or through relocating and integratingelsewhere in the country, b) when theyno longer have specific assistance andprotection needs linked to their displacement,and c) when they can exercise theirhuman rights without discrimination. 41Whichever settlement option displacedpeople choose to pursue, theyoften face continuing problems and risksthat require support beyond the acutephase of a disaster. Achieving a durablesolution is a gradual and complex processthat needs timely and coordinated effortsto address humanitarian, developmentand human rights concerns.As such, an effective response todisplacement requires IDPs’ basic needsfor immediate protection and assistanceto be met in tandem with longer-termprocesses to ensure that solutions aredurable. Such an approach should includemeasures that reduce the risk offurther disaster and repeated displacement,wherever people choose and areable to settle. 42Further explanation of terms can befound in the methodological notes in annexA.2 | Conceptualising displacement in the context of disasters17
- Page 1: Global Estimates 2015People displac
- Page 4 and 5: IDMC core project teamCoordinator/l
- Page 7 and 8: 5. Mind your assumptions: Protracte
- Page 9 and 10: FIGURES, TABLES AND MAPSFigure 2.1:
- Page 11 and 12: Modelled global displacement trend
- Page 13 and 14: 1INTRODUCTIONSince 2008, an average
- Page 15 and 16: 2CONCEPTUALISINGDISPLACEMENTin the
- Page 17: Box 2.1: Slow-onset hazards and gra
- Page 21 and 22: 3THE GLOBAL PICTUREScale, patterns
- Page 23 and 24: Figure 3.2: Global displacement by
- Page 25 and 26: Box 3.1: “Super” El Niño and d
- Page 27 and 28: While more resilient families may b
- Page 30 and 31: 28 Global Estimates 2015A woman sta
- Page 32 and 33: 4.1 RegionsAs in previous years, As
- Page 34 and 35: 4.2 CountriesThe number of people d
- Page 36 and 37: forward, the municipalities of Pasc
- Page 38 and 39: 4.4 The big three: China, India and
- Page 40 and 41: Map 4.1: Philippines regions affect
- Page 42 and 43: Displacement caused by seasonalfloo
- Page 44 and 45: 4.6 Multiple hazards in fragile and
- Page 46 and 47: SPOTLIGHTAFGHANISTANBlurred lines b
- Page 48 and 49: 46 Global Estimates 2015A displaced
- Page 50 and 51: The global data presented in this r
- Page 52 and 53: The international experts we interv
- Page 54 and 55: perstorm Sandy in 2009, and indigen
- Page 56 and 57: SPOTLIGHTPAPUA NEW GUINEAManam isla
- Page 58 and 59: SPOTLIGHTINDONESIASidoarjo mudflow
- Page 60 and 61: SPOTLIGHTBANGLADESHSix years after
- Page 62 and 63: Figure 5.4: Movement of IDPs from a
- Page 64 and 65: SPOTLIGHTHAITIChronic vulnerability
- Page 66 and 67: Conditions have continued to deteri
- Page 68 and 69:
Map 5.3: Ongoing displacement in th
- Page 70 and 71:
The mental and physical health ofID
- Page 72 and 73:
SPOTLIGHTUNITED STATESDisplaced peo
- Page 74:
assistance available and implementa
- Page 77 and 78:
6THE POST-2015GLOBAL POLICYAGENDAKe
- Page 79 and 80:
A landslide devastated villages in
- Page 81 and 82:
ANNEX AMethodologyIDMC’s annual G
- Page 83 and 84:
protracted displacement situations
- Page 85 and 86:
Data on housing rendereduninhabitab
- Page 87 and 88:
Modelling and calibration usingthe
- Page 89 and 90:
We also asked each interviewee toth
- Page 91 and 92:
RankingCountry Hazard Affected area
- Page 93 and 94:
* Text in parentheses indicates the
- Page 95 and 96:
Country DisasterStartdateTotal no.
- Page 98 and 99:
Country DisasterStartdateTotal no.
- Page 100 and 101:
Country DisasterStartdateTotal no.
- Page 102 and 103:
REFERENCESSection 21. UNISDR, Termi
- Page 104 and 105:
34. NDRRMC, SitRep No.27 re Effects
- Page 106 and 107:
nation Group, October 2009, availab
- Page 108:
digidepo_8841940_po_076709.pdf?cont