SPOTLIGHTPAPUA NEW GUINEAManam islanders still displaced tenyears after volcanic eruptionPapua New Guinea (PNG) is prone toa range of natural hazards, includingdrought, floods, tropical cyclones, landslides,volcanic eruptions, earthquakesand tsunamis. It is also highly vulnerableto the impacts of climate change and risingsea-levels. An estimated 21,186 peoplewere displaced by natural hazards andthe disasters they triggered in 2014, withflooding being the main driver. 33One of the largest displacementscaused by a volcanic eruption in PNG tookplace in late 2004 when around 11,000people were forced to flee their homeson Manam island in Madang province. 34All were evacuated 15 kilometres to mainlandareas near the town of Bogia, wheremany were accommodated in temporarygovernment settlement sites or “care centres”,as they are officially known. Otherssought refuge with host communities. 35Given the risk of further volcanicactivity, Manam was declared unsafefor return and the authorities began toconsider alternative settlement optionsfor the island’s IDPs. Local integrationin the care centres was quickly deemedunsustainable because of a shortage ofland and resources, and rising tensionsbetween the displaced and local communities.The land on which the centreswere set up was said to be owned by thegovernment, which gave IDPs permissionto stay temporarily. Locals, however,claimed that they, not the state, were therightful owners. 36In 2006, the government identifiedland for the IDPs’ relocation in Andarum,around 50 kilometres from Bogia. Themajority agreed to move providing infrastructureincluding roads, schools andhealth centres was built and they wouldhave enough land to cultivate. Legislationwas passed and the government establishedthe Manam Resettlement Authority(MRA), tasked with taking the projectforward.A displaced woman from Manam island carries onwith everyday chores at the Mangem care centre,Bogia town, Madang province, Papua New Guinea.Photo: IDMC/Frederik Kok, October 201454 Global <strong>Estimates</strong> 2015
Figure 5.2: Displacement timeline following the Manam volcanic eruption in 20042004Volcaniceruption -11,000 peopleflee to carecentres onthe mainland2006Manam ResettlementAuthority set up to identifyand purchase land2008Tobenam care centre burntdown following clashesbetween IDPs and locals;some IDPs forced to returnto their island2010-2011Renewedvolcanicactivity2013Madang governor introduces billto establish the Manam RestorationAuthority ActPreliminary agreement on landacquisition between the Madangprovincial gov’t and thelandowners in Andarum2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 20152005Reports of diminishing supportand deteriorating conditionsin the care centresTension between IDPs andlocal communities, particularlyover land use issues, lead toperiodic violent clashes2007Interagency reportfinds that minimumstandards relatedto education, health,water, housing andnutrition are not metSources: IDMC interviews, 2014; ABC, 2012; OHCHR, 2011; IFRC, 20052010Manam resettlementtask force established torevive the process ofresettling Manam IDPs2014 2015Delegation of IDPs to Estimatedtravel to Port Moresby 15,000 peopleto present the Manam from ManamRestoration Authority remain in careAct to the chief centressecretary of PNGgovernment whocommits to adopt thebill soonLittle progress was made in the followingyears, however, and the projectremains stalled. The main obstacles havebeen a shortage of funds, a lack of politicalwill, bureaucratic delays and poor localtechnical capacity. In 2009 the MRA wasdisbanded with new legislation needed toset up a new body. The provincial governmenthas also had difficulties in acquiringthe land concerned. It concluded apreliminary agreement with the ownersin 2013, but as of early 2015 it had still notformalised the purchase and, more thana decade after their displacement, IDPswere still stuck in three care centres inand around Bogia. When IDMC visited inOctober 2014, the displaced populationhad reportedly grown to around 15,000. 37A few thousand people have returnedto Manam despite its lack of arable landand the absence of public services. 38Most did so between 2008 and 2009,following clashes between IDPs and thelocal population, and some returns weresaid to have been forced by the government.39 Further returns have taken placesince, driven by deteriorating living conditionsin the care centres and unresolvedtensions with local communities. Giventhe government’s failure to update itsdata on Manam’s IDPs, however, there isno clear picture of how many people arestill living in the centres and how manyhave returned to the island.Most of the houses in the care centresare in need of repair. Roofs leak and wallsare in poor shape, but IDPs say they areunable to access building materials fromthe forest because the resources belongto the locals. They are also short of food,and their livelihood options are limitedbecause what little land is available tothem for cultivation is infertile. Some ownlivestock and are able to fish, but manyare barely able to get by.Poverty and insecurity also impedetheir access to healthcare services. InJune 2010, 17 IDPs living in the Potsdamcare centre died of cholera. The deathscould have been prevented if an earlywarning system had been in place todetect the outbreak, medicine had beenavailable to treat the disease quickly andthe IDPs had been able to afford the 100kina ($40) it costs to reach the nearesthealth facility by boat. It is likely that malnutritionalso contributed to the deathtoll. 40The threat of physical attack restrictsIDPs’ freedom of movement, and somewomen say they are too afraid to leavetheir camps to seek medical care. An increasingnumber of infants and mothershave died during childbirth as a result. 41After ten years in living in displacement,the Manam island IDPs are still nocloser to achieving a durable solution.Local integration is not an option, andefforts to relocate them to Andarum havemade little progress. Many have lost hopethat it will ever happen. In the meantimeboth short and long-term solutions areneeded to ensure that their most pressingconcerns are addressed. They require immediateassistance in meeting their food,water, shelter and healthcare needs, andreducing the number of IDPs in the carecentres is also becoming urgent. Thegovernment needs to make good on itsrepeated promises to ensure that therelocation project really moves forward.Reports that the Manam RestorationAuthority bill could be introduced in parliamentin May 2015 offer a glimmer ofhope. 42 If adopted, the legislation wouldprovide a much-needed legal basis forthe relocation project and the allocationof adequate resources. The Madang provincialauthorities are also consideringfeasibility studies to assess its environmentaland social impact. 435 | Mind your assumptions: Protracted displacement following disasters55
- Page 1:
Global Estimates 2015People displac
- Page 4 and 5:
IDMC core project teamCoordinator/l
- Page 7 and 8: 5. Mind your assumptions: Protracte
- Page 9 and 10: FIGURES, TABLES AND MAPSFigure 2.1:
- Page 11 and 12: Modelled global displacement trend
- Page 13 and 14: 1INTRODUCTIONSince 2008, an average
- Page 15 and 16: 2CONCEPTUALISINGDISPLACEMENTin the
- Page 17 and 18: Box 2.1: Slow-onset hazards and gra
- Page 19 and 20: Repeated and frequent displacementR
- Page 21 and 22: 3THE GLOBAL PICTUREScale, patterns
- Page 23 and 24: Figure 3.2: Global displacement by
- Page 25 and 26: Box 3.1: “Super” El Niño and d
- Page 27 and 28: While more resilient families may b
- Page 30 and 31: 28 Global Estimates 2015A woman sta
- Page 32 and 33: 4.1 RegionsAs in previous years, As
- Page 34 and 35: 4.2 CountriesThe number of people d
- Page 36 and 37: forward, the municipalities of Pasc
- Page 38 and 39: 4.4 The big three: China, India and
- Page 40 and 41: Map 4.1: Philippines regions affect
- Page 42 and 43: Displacement caused by seasonalfloo
- Page 44 and 45: 4.6 Multiple hazards in fragile and
- Page 46 and 47: SPOTLIGHTAFGHANISTANBlurred lines b
- Page 48 and 49: 46 Global Estimates 2015A displaced
- Page 50 and 51: The global data presented in this r
- Page 52 and 53: The international experts we interv
- Page 54 and 55: perstorm Sandy in 2009, and indigen
- Page 58 and 59: SPOTLIGHTINDONESIASidoarjo mudflow
- Page 60 and 61: SPOTLIGHTBANGLADESHSix years after
- Page 62 and 63: Figure 5.4: Movement of IDPs from a
- Page 64 and 65: SPOTLIGHTHAITIChronic vulnerability
- Page 66 and 67: Conditions have continued to deteri
- Page 68 and 69: Map 5.3: Ongoing displacement in th
- Page 70 and 71: The mental and physical health ofID
- Page 72 and 73: SPOTLIGHTUNITED STATESDisplaced peo
- Page 74: assistance available and implementa
- Page 77 and 78: 6THE POST-2015GLOBAL POLICYAGENDAKe
- Page 79 and 80: A landslide devastated villages in
- Page 81 and 82: ANNEX AMethodologyIDMC’s annual G
- Page 83 and 84: protracted displacement situations
- Page 85 and 86: Data on housing rendereduninhabitab
- Page 87 and 88: Modelling and calibration usingthe
- Page 89 and 90: We also asked each interviewee toth
- Page 91 and 92: RankingCountry Hazard Affected area
- Page 93 and 94: * Text in parentheses indicates the
- Page 95 and 96: Country DisasterStartdateTotal no.
- Page 98 and 99: Country DisasterStartdateTotal no.
- Page 100 and 101: Country DisasterStartdateTotal no.
- Page 102 and 103: REFERENCESSection 21. UNISDR, Termi
- Page 104 and 105: 34. NDRRMC, SitRep No.27 re Effects
- Page 106 and 107:
nation Group, October 2009, availab
- Page 108:
digidepo_8841940_po_076709.pdf?cont