1999 Comments on the Prehistory of Far Northeastern Chihuahua, the La Junta District, and the CieloComplex. Journal of Big Bend Studies 11:49–92.Marshall, Michael P. and Henry J. Walt1984 Rio Abajo: Prehistory and History of a Rio Grande Province. New Mexico Historic PreservationDivision, Santa Fe.Maxwell, Timothy D.1986 Archaeological Test Excavations at the Townsend Site (LA 34150), Chaves County, NewMexico. Museum of New Mexico, Laboratory of Anthropology Notes No. 344. Santa Fe.McBride, Pamela J. and Mollie S. Toll2003 Macrobotanical Remains. In Salt Creek: Data Recovery at Seven Prehistoric Sites along US 285in Chaves and De Baca Counties, New Mexico by Nancy J. Akins, pp.279–296. Museum of NewMexico, Office of Archaeological Studies, Archaeology Notes 298. Santa Fe.Mick-O’Hara, Linda1996 Analysis of Faunal Remains from the Picacho Project. In The Land in Between: Archaic andFormative Occupations along the Upper Rio Hondo of Southeastern New Mexico, by Regge N.Wiseman, pp. 157–180. Museum of New Mexico, Office of Archaeological Studies, ArchaeologyNotes 125. Santa Fe.Minnis, Paul E.1985 Domesticated People and Plants in the Greater Southwest. In Prehistoric Food Production inNorth America, edited by Richard I. Ford, pp.309-339. Anthropological Papers, Museum ofAnthropology, University of Michigan 75. Ann Arbor.Mobley, Charles M.1979 The Terminal Archaic at Los Esteros: A Late Hunter-Gatherer Community on the JornadaMogollon Frontier. In Jornada Mogollon Archaeology: Proceedings of the First JornadaConference, edited by Patrick H. Beckett and Regge N. Wiseman, pp. 201–222. New MexicoHistoric Preservation Division. Santa Fe.1981 Archaic Hunter-Gatherer Settlement in Northeastern New Mexico. PhD dissertation, Departmentof Anthropology, Southern Methodist University. University Microfilms International, AnnArbor.O’Connell, James F.1987 Alyawara Site Structure and its Archaeological Implications. American Antiquity 52:74–108.Parker, Bradley J. and Lars Rodseth2005 Introduction: Theoretical Considerations in the Study of Frontiers. In Untaming the Frontier inAnthropology, Archaeology, and History, edited by Bradley J. Parker and Lars Rodseth, pp. 3–21. The University of Arizona Press. Tucson.Prewitt, Elton R.1981 Cultural Chronology in Central Texas. Bulletin of the Texas Archeological Society 52:65–89.1985 From Circleville to Toyah: Comments on Central Texas Chronology. Bulletin of the TexasArcheological Society 54 (for 1983):201–238.4-70
Rayl, Sandy1986 Nonbison Faunal Remains. In Archaeological Test Excavations at the Townsend Site (LA34150), Chaves County, New Mexico by Timothy D. Maxwell, pp. 80-84. Museum of NewMexico, Laboratory of Anthropology Notes No. 344. Santa FeRicklis, Robert A.1992 The Spread of a Late Prehistoric Bison Hunting Complex: Evidence from the South-CentralCoastal Prairie of Texas. Plains Anthropologist 37(140):261–274.Roberts, Frank H. H., Jr.1942 Archeological and Geological Investigations in the San Jon District, Eastern New Mexico.Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 103(4). Smithsonian Institution. Washington D.C.Rocek, Thomas R. and John D. Speth1986 The Henderson Site Burials: Glimpses of a Late Prehistoric Population in the Pecos Valley.Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Technical Reports Number 18, ResearchReports in Archaeology Constribution 13. Ann Arbor.Roney, John R.1995 Prehistory of the Guadalupe Mountains. The Artifact 33(1). El Paso Archaeological Society. ElPaso, Texas.Schelberg, John D. and Nancy J. Akins1987 Turtles, Sciurids, and Artemesia: Seasonal Exploitation at Los Esteros. In Advances in MiddlePecos Archaeology: Proceedings of a Symposium Held at the Fourth Jornada MogollonConference, Tularosa, New Mexico on October 12, 1985, edited by Susana R. Katz and PaulKatz, pp. 15–29.Scholes, France V. and H. P. Mera1940 Some Aspects of the Jumano Problem. Research Report 34, pp. 265–299. Contributions toAmerican Anthropology and History. Carnegie Institution, Washingon DC.Sebastian, Lynne1983 Anasazi Site Typology and Chronology. In Economy and Interaction Along the Lower ChacoRiver, edited by Patrick Hogan and Joseph C. Winter, pp. 403–419. Office of ContractArcheology, University of New Mexico. Albuquerque.Sebastian, Lynne and Signa Larralde1989 Living on the Land: 11,000 Years of Human Adaptation in Southeastern New Mexico. Bureau ofLand Management, New Mexico State Office, Cultural Resources Series No. 6. Santa Fe.Sellards, E.H.1952 Early Man in America. University of Texas Press. Austin.Seymour, Deni J.2002 Conquest and Concealment: After the El Paso Phase on Fort Bliss. Lone Mountain Report525/528. Lone Mountain Archaeological Services, El Paso, Texas.2004 A Rancheria in the Gran Apacheria: Evidence of Intercultural Interation at the Cerro Rojo Site.Plains Anthropologist 49(190):153–192.4-71
- Page 3 and 4:
National Register criteria, and dat
- Page 5 and 6:
• What data sets are needed to ad
- Page 7 and 8:
Fields, may be downloaded from the
- Page 9 and 10:
Development of Southeastern New Mex
- Page 12 and 13:
Table of Contents ContinuedRadiocar
- Page 14 and 15:
List of Tables ContinuedTable 3.13T
- Page 16 and 17:
CHAPTER 2PHYSIOGRAPHY, GEOARCHAEOLO
- Page 18 and 19:
The Llano Estacado Section or South
- Page 20 and 21:
Table 2.1 Selected Geologic Referen
- Page 22 and 23:
Portales ValleyThe Portales Valley
- Page 24 and 25:
The thickness of surficial deposits
- Page 26 and 27:
Alluvial Flats. Denudation of bedro
- Page 28 and 29:
Table 2.3 Physiographic Regions and
- Page 30 and 31:
Table 2.4Expected Average Condition
- Page 32 and 33:
Site densities were calculated for
- Page 34 and 35:
Figure 2.6. Area surveyed in square
- Page 36 and 37:
15. Based on the strong direct rela
- Page 38 and 39:
REFERENCES CITEDAltschul, J. H., Se
- Page 40 and 41:
2005 Surficial Geologic Map of New
- Page 42 and 43:
PREVIOUS TYPOLOGIESA number of typo
- Page 44 and 45:
Expectation for quarry sites and to
- Page 46 and 47:
As shown in Table 3.2, artifact sca
- Page 48 and 49:
Table 3.3 Rank ordering of feature
- Page 50 and 51:
Figure 3.2features.Histogram showin
- Page 52 and 53:
Table 3.5Expanded Component Types (
- Page 54 and 55:
11. cave - a natural hollow or open
- Page 56 and 57:
Ring Midden - a general donut-shape
- Page 58 and 59:
Table 3.7Occurrences of Surface and
- Page 60 and 61:
Our next concern was therefore the
- Page 62 and 63:
SITETYPE/GEOARCH LANO SUBSISTENCE R
- Page 64 and 65:
SITETYPE/GEOARCH LANO EFFORT AREA E
- Page 66 and 67:
ecause we don’t know how many sit
- Page 68 and 69:
Table 3.10 Proportional Area, Surve
- Page 70 and 71:
Table 3.11 Distribution of Paleoind
- Page 72 and 73:
Figure 3.53-32
- Page 74 and 75:
Figure 3.63-34
- Page 76 and 77:
Figure 3.73-36
- Page 78 and 79:
Not surprisingly, the distribution
- Page 80 and 81:
Table 3.15 Distribution of Unknown
- Page 82 and 83:
Pielou, E. C.1969 An Introduction t
- Page 84 and 85:
Wiseman, Regge N.1996 Corn Camp and
- Page 86 and 87:
and projectile point chronologies c
- Page 88 and 89:
Folsom is also reasonably well date
- Page 90 and 91:
The Portales Complex is no longer v
- Page 92 and 93:
described by some authors in the lo
- Page 94 and 95:
Based on the available evidence, th
- Page 96 and 97:
CeramicIn contrast to the Archaic,
- Page 98 and 99:
this feature type were observed. On
- Page 100 and 101:
Except for Brantley Reservoir, all
- Page 102 and 103:
• Did agricultural groups eventua
- Page 104 and 105: The two complexes are distinguished
- Page 106 and 107: the Apaches. Based on their locatio
- Page 108 and 109: PaleoindianFor the Paleoindian peri
- Page 110 and 111: For Sebastian and Larralde, the que
- Page 112 and 113: Bohrer’s interpretation of the Fr
- Page 114 and 115: As Sebastian and Larralde recognize
- Page 116 and 117: In the Brantley Reservoir area of t
- Page 118 and 119: small game. Some rodents may also h
- Page 120 and 121: partly dependent on agriculture aft
- Page 122 and 123: with the procurement of some wild r
- Page 124 and 125: The last question is fundamental to
- Page 126 and 127: areas, and the simultaneous presenc
- Page 128 and 129: • what subsistence resources othe
- Page 130 and 131: The labor invested in the construct
- Page 132 and 133: Once site types are defined, the se
- Page 134 and 135: PaleoindianAs discussed previously,
- Page 136 and 137: From the above discussion, then, th
- Page 138 and 139: Acquisition of the horse would have
- Page 140 and 141: In using modern environmental data
- Page 142 and 143: Table 4.1 Priority General Question
- Page 144 and 145: Chronology and Culture History Subs
- Page 146 and 147: Table 4.3. General question posed u
- Page 148 and 149: 1983 In Pursuit of the Past. Thames
- Page 150 and 151: Gamble, C. S. and W. A. Boismier (e
- Page 152 and 153: 1997 Analysis of Paleoindian Bonbed
- Page 156 and 157: Shelley, Phillip H.1994 A Geoarchae
- Page 158 and 159: 2000 Crosby Draw and River Camp: Co
- Page 160 and 161: NMCRIS data indicate that survey co
- Page 162 and 163: Addressing the Research QuestionsTh
- Page 164 and 165: There are two major shortcomings to
- Page 166 and 167: Artifact assemblages need to be des
- Page 168 and 169: As with the selection of sites, the
- Page 170 and 171: Architectural Sites(Single Residenc
- Page 172 and 173: Based on the discussion of regional
- Page 174 and 175: If Unit 1 deposits are exposed, the
- Page 176 and 177: few artifacts are recovered and the
- Page 178 and 179: 2. Large artifacts should be tagged
- Page 180 and 181: h. Subfloor tests will be dug to de
- Page 182 and 183: . 1 x 1 m grids and/or backhoe tren
- Page 184 and 185: Geophysical Remote SensingGeophysic
- Page 186 and 187: 1987 Man the Hunted: Determinants o
- Page 188 and 189: CHRONOLOGICAL SAMPLINGGeneral Guide
- Page 190 and 191: a. Conversions of Radiocarbon Years
- Page 192 and 193: f. Samples should not be exposed to
- Page 194 and 195: LITHIC ARTIFACT ANALYSISThe goals o
- Page 196 and 197: 24Manuport,tabular25 GroundstoneNon
- Page 198 and 199: Use wear codes, terms and descripti
- Page 200 and 201: B. Mano1. Type2. Material type3. Or
- Page 202 and 203: References CitedAcklen, John C., Ma
- Page 204 and 205:
PROPOSED LITHIC MATERIAL CODE SHEET
- Page 206 and 207:
108 light gray with profuse red (26
- Page 208 and 209:
CERAMIC ANALYSISThe goals of the ce
- Page 210 and 211:
Jornada Red TooledJornada Corrugate
- Page 212 and 213:
Santa Fe Black-on-whiteGalisteo Bla
- Page 214 and 215:
VI. Whole Vessels1. Vessel height2.
- Page 216 and 217:
Data NeedsA. Usage of more sophisti
- Page 218 and 219:
5. The determination to wash the fa
- Page 220 and 221:
ARCHEOBOTANICAL STUDIES(from Dean 2
- Page 222 and 223:
V. Sample Size and NumberA. A recom
- Page 224 and 225:
B. Data return is dependent upon pr
- Page 226 and 227:
Or submit the vessel for a pollen w
- Page 228 and 229:
# FlotationSamples Flotation Sample
- Page 230:
might include “quids”, sandals,