PREFACE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 3.63-34
Table 3.13 Distribution of Ceramic Component Types by Physiographic Unit and Drainage Basin.Artifact ScatterPossibleStructureDomesticFeaturesRing Midden/Burned RockBedrockMortarMiscellaneousFeaturesCaveRockshelterQuarry/LithicProcurementSingleResidenceMultipleResidenceResidentialComplexTotalz-scoresPHYSIOGRAPHIC UNITSSacramento Slope 276 48 56 175 7 20 14 14 1 43 36 16 706 0.9317Pecos ValleyPecos River Valley 119 9 118 31 10 15 0 3 0 12 6 4 327 -3.7893Northern Pecos Slopes 42 3 14 1 0 5 0 8 0 3 4 6 86 -0.1446Southwest Pecos Slope 10 2 10 30 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 56 -0.3172Portales Valley 12 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0.0255Mescalero Plain 1018 22 924 16 9 202 1 2 4 12 7 0 2217 7.7385Upper Canadian River 5 2 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 17 -0.4722Llano Estacado 40 1 23 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 69 -0.7765Total 1522 87 1153 253 28 250 16 28 6 71 57 26 3497DRAINAGE BASINSPintada Arroyo-Yeso Creek 60 4 18 1 2 4 0 6 0 5 5 6 111 0.1818Rio Hondo-Arroyo del Macho 226 37 40 2 8 14 3 6 1 38 35 18 428 2.8016Rio Penasco-Rio Felix 19 2 15 5 0 3 0 0 0 5 1 0 50 -2.0826Seven Rivers-Dark Canyon 74 11 56 221 3 7 10 9 0 1 3 0 395 -3.0301Total 379 54 129 229 13 28 13 21 1 49 44 24 9843-35
Page 3 and 4:
National Register criteria, and dat
Page 5 and 6:
• What data sets are needed to ad
Page 7 and 8:
Fields, may be downloaded from the
Page 9 and 10:
Development of Southeastern New Mex
Page 12 and 13:
Table of Contents ContinuedRadiocar
Page 14 and 15:
List of Tables ContinuedTable 3.13T
Page 16 and 17:
CHAPTER 2PHYSIOGRAPHY, GEOARCHAEOLO
Page 18 and 19:
The Llano Estacado Section or South
Page 20 and 21:
Table 2.1 Selected Geologic Referen
Page 22 and 23:
Portales ValleyThe Portales Valley
Page 24 and 25: The thickness of surficial deposits
Page 26 and 27: Alluvial Flats. Denudation of bedro
Page 28 and 29: Table 2.3 Physiographic Regions and
Page 30 and 31: Table 2.4Expected Average Condition
Page 32 and 33: Site densities were calculated for
Page 34 and 35: Figure 2.6. Area surveyed in square
Page 36 and 37: 15. Based on the strong direct rela
Page 38 and 39: REFERENCES CITEDAltschul, J. H., Se
Page 40 and 41: 2005 Surficial Geologic Map of New
Page 42 and 43: PREVIOUS TYPOLOGIESA number of typo
Page 44 and 45: Expectation for quarry sites and to
Page 46 and 47: As shown in Table 3.2, artifact sca
Page 48 and 49: Table 3.3 Rank ordering of feature
Page 50 and 51: Figure 3.2features.Histogram showin
Page 52 and 53: Table 3.5Expanded Component Types (
Page 54 and 55: 11. cave - a natural hollow or open
Page 56 and 57: Ring Midden - a general donut-shape
Page 58 and 59: Table 3.7Occurrences of Surface and
Page 60 and 61: Our next concern was therefore the
Page 62 and 63: SITETYPE/GEOARCH LANO SUBSISTENCE R
Page 64 and 65: SITETYPE/GEOARCH LANO EFFORT AREA E
Page 66 and 67: ecause we don’t know how many sit
Page 68 and 69: Table 3.10 Proportional Area, Surve
Page 70 and 71: Table 3.11 Distribution of Paleoind
Page 72 and 73: Figure 3.53-32
Page 76 and 77: Figure 3.73-36
Page 78 and 79: Not surprisingly, the distribution
Page 80 and 81: Table 3.15 Distribution of Unknown
Page 82 and 83: Pielou, E. C.1969 An Introduction t
Page 84 and 85: Wiseman, Regge N.1996 Corn Camp and
Page 86 and 87: and projectile point chronologies c
Page 88 and 89: Folsom is also reasonably well date
Page 90 and 91: The Portales Complex is no longer v
Page 92 and 93: described by some authors in the lo
Page 94 and 95: Based on the available evidence, th
Page 96 and 97: CeramicIn contrast to the Archaic,
Page 98 and 99: this feature type were observed. On
Page 100 and 101: Except for Brantley Reservoir, all
Page 102 and 103: • Did agricultural groups eventua
Page 104 and 105: The two complexes are distinguished
Page 106 and 107: the Apaches. Based on their locatio
Page 108 and 109: PaleoindianFor the Paleoindian peri
Page 110 and 111: For Sebastian and Larralde, the que
Page 112 and 113: Bohrer’s interpretation of the Fr
Page 114 and 115: As Sebastian and Larralde recognize
Page 116 and 117: In the Brantley Reservoir area of t
Page 118 and 119: small game. Some rodents may also h
Page 120 and 121: partly dependent on agriculture aft
Page 122 and 123: with the procurement of some wild r
Page 124 and 125:
The last question is fundamental to
Page 126 and 127:
areas, and the simultaneous presenc
Page 128 and 129:
• what subsistence resources othe
Page 130 and 131:
The labor invested in the construct
Page 132 and 133:
Once site types are defined, the se
Page 134 and 135:
PaleoindianAs discussed previously,
Page 136 and 137:
From the above discussion, then, th
Page 138 and 139:
Acquisition of the horse would have
Page 140 and 141:
In using modern environmental data
Page 142 and 143:
Table 4.1 Priority General Question
Page 144 and 145:
Chronology and Culture History Subs
Page 146 and 147:
Table 4.3. General question posed u
Page 148 and 149:
1983 In Pursuit of the Past. Thames
Page 150 and 151:
Gamble, C. S. and W. A. Boismier (e
Page 152 and 153:
1997 Analysis of Paleoindian Bonbed
Page 154 and 155:
1999 Comments on the Prehistory of
Page 156 and 157:
Shelley, Phillip H.1994 A Geoarchae
Page 158 and 159:
2000 Crosby Draw and River Camp: Co
Page 160 and 161:
NMCRIS data indicate that survey co
Page 162 and 163:
Addressing the Research QuestionsTh
Page 164 and 165:
There are two major shortcomings to
Page 166 and 167:
Artifact assemblages need to be des
Page 168 and 169:
As with the selection of sites, the
Page 170 and 171:
Architectural Sites(Single Residenc
Page 172 and 173:
Based on the discussion of regional
Page 174 and 175:
If Unit 1 deposits are exposed, the
Page 176 and 177:
few artifacts are recovered and the
Page 178 and 179:
2. Large artifacts should be tagged
Page 180 and 181:
h. Subfloor tests will be dug to de
Page 182 and 183:
. 1 x 1 m grids and/or backhoe tren
Page 184 and 185:
Geophysical Remote SensingGeophysic
Page 186 and 187:
1987 Man the Hunted: Determinants o
Page 188 and 189:
CHRONOLOGICAL SAMPLINGGeneral Guide
Page 190 and 191:
a. Conversions of Radiocarbon Years
Page 192 and 193:
f. Samples should not be exposed to
Page 194 and 195:
LITHIC ARTIFACT ANALYSISThe goals o
Page 196 and 197:
24Manuport,tabular25 GroundstoneNon
Page 198 and 199:
Use wear codes, terms and descripti
Page 200 and 201:
B. Mano1. Type2. Material type3. Or
Page 202 and 203:
References CitedAcklen, John C., Ma
Page 204 and 205:
PROPOSED LITHIC MATERIAL CODE SHEET
Page 206 and 207:
108 light gray with profuse red (26
Page 208 and 209:
CERAMIC ANALYSISThe goals of the ce
Page 210 and 211:
Jornada Red TooledJornada Corrugate
Page 212 and 213:
Santa Fe Black-on-whiteGalisteo Bla
Page 214 and 215:
VI. Whole Vessels1. Vessel height2.
Page 216 and 217:
Data NeedsA. Usage of more sophisti
Page 218 and 219:
5. The determination to wash the fa
Page 220 and 221:
ARCHEOBOTANICAL STUDIES(from Dean 2
Page 222 and 223:
V. Sample Size and NumberA. A recom
Page 224 and 225:
B. Data return is dependent upon pr
Page 226 and 227:
Or submit the vessel for a pollen w
Page 228 and 229:
# FlotationSamples Flotation Sample
Page 230:
might include “quids”, sandals,
show all

PREFACE

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?