Draft

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 20 PDA Readiness Criteria Worksheet PDA name: San Mateo El Camino Real Version: Amended # Readiness Criteria Category # Sub-Criterion Name Present (2012) PDA Development Readiness Scoring 2020 2030 2040 Notes E Infrastructure Capacity, Needs, and Financing 1 Existing infrastructure capacity 0.00 0.00 0.00 Infrastructure is largely in place. Most infrastructure demands identified in City survey are for aesthetic improvements, bike/ped, etc., rather than major upgrades to circulation or utilities. Site design needs to address curb cut issues. ECR and Hillsdale undercrossing may be a constraint, which may be addressed through HSR/Caltrain electrification. 2 Is there an existing CIP funded or other infrastructure financing plan in place? City has impact fees for transportation improvements, schools, parks, affordable housing, water/wastewater, etc. A-62 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 PDA financing capacity City survey indicates only about $6.9 million in infrastructure costs required, which sums to under $6,000 per residential unit. 0.00 0.00 0.00 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 3/26/2013 Page 4 of 4 P:\121000\121113MTC\Readiness_Assessment Process\PDA Readiness Assessment\DS_Readiness Assessment_032513
3,000 2,500 Figure 21: San Mateo El Camino Real Planned Housing Capacity, Production Trendline, and Plan Bay Area Allocation Plan Bay Area 2040 Capacity 2012 2,000 A-63 Units 1,500 1,000 500 Trendline (2000-2010) Readiness (Base) Readiness (Amended) 0 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Year
Page 1 and 2:
Draft March 2013 Strategy for a Sus
Page 3 and 4:
Final Report PDA Readiness Assessme
Page 5 and 6:
1. REPORT SUMMARY AND FINDINGS Plan
Page 7 and 8:
Table 1 Summary of PDA Readiness As
Page 9 and 10:
PDA Readiness Assessment Final Repo
Page 11 and 12:
2. STUDY BACKGROUND Over the past s
Page 13 and 14:
3. PDA DEVELOPMENT READINESS ASSESS
Page 15 and 16:
Table 2 Capacity Assessment for Sel
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Table 3 PDA Readiness Criteria Work
Page 21 and 22:
Table 3 PDA Readiness Criteria Work
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
5. POLICY ACTIONS TO IMPROVE DEVELO
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
A-1 Units 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,0
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 2 PDA Readiness Criteria Wor
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60: Figure 4 PDA Readiness Criteria Wor
Page 75 and 76: 7,000 6,000 5,000 Figure 9: Redwood
Page 77 and 78: Figure 10 PDA Readiness Criteria Wo
Page 93 and 94: 7,000 6,000 5,000 Figure 15: Santa
Page 109: Figure 20 PDA Readiness Criteria Wo
Page 129 and 130: 140,000 120,000 100,000 Figure 27:
Page 147 and 148: 3,000 2,500 Figure 33: Antioch Hill
Page 161 and 162:
Figure 38 PDA Readiness Criteria Wo
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 Figure 39:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
4,000 3,500 3,000 Figure 45: Pittsb
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
2,500 2,000 Figure 51: Morgan Hill
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 Figure 57:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Metropolitan Transportation Commiss
show all

Draft

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?