Draft

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 35 PDA Readiness Criteria Worksheet PDA name: Milpitas TASP PDA Version: Amended # Readiness Criteria Category # Sub-Criterion Name Present (2012) PDA Development Readiness Scoring 2020 2030 2040 Notes A PDA Housing Capacity Estimate 1 Estimate of current local land use policy new housing capacity 6,136 See "Capacity Assessment for Selected Priority Development Areas" 2 Plan Bay Area new housing allocation 7,080 The increment of new housing allocated to the PDA in Plan Bay Area A-104 Capacity surplus or 3 (shortfall) 4 Estimated increased capacity through likely changes to land use policy, including any initiative-based density restrictions (percentage change to existing capacity) (944) 0% 0% 0% Difference between estimated housing capacity (2012) and allocation Current policy may not adequately incentivize redevelopment of a sufficient number of existing commercial uses 5 Estimated gross housing capacity at each period 6,136 6,136 6,136 6 Sum of Capacity Constraint Coefficients 0.40 0.20 0.00 7 EPS estimate of housing production given constraints 8 Percentage of PDA 2040 housing allocation accommodated Summary 3,682 4,909 6,136 52.0% 69.3% 86.7% The TASP Area is poised to transform into a vital transit-oriented neighborhood given the new BART Station and the recently adopted Specific Plan. Phase 1 development, roughly half of development capacity, should be developed in next 5 to 10 years. Phase 2 development, largely occurring on existing developed properties, will take longer to evolve. The amended sceanrio assumes that redevelopment powers and funding will be re-instated to assist with this Phase 2 development. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 3/26/2013 Page 1 of 4 P:\121000\121113MTC\Readiness_Assessment Process\PDA Readiness Assessment\WK_Readiness Assessments\All_WK_Sample032513
Figure 35 PDA Readiness Criteria Worksheet PDA name: Milpitas TASP PDA Version: Amended # Readiness Criteria Category # Sub-Criterion Name Present (2012) PDA Development Readiness Scoring 2020 2030 2040 Notes B Planning and Entitlement Criteria 1 Displacement of existing stable residential neighborhoods 0.00 0.00 0.00 None of the existing residential units are presumed to be redeveloped nor need to be redeveloped to achieve allocation 2 Time required and difficulty in obtaining entitlement: institutional capacity and jurisdictional track record City has good track record regarding expeditions entitlements processing A-105 0.00 0.00 0.00 C Community Support 1 Elected official support for proposed PDA use types and densities during past 3 years 0.00 0.00 0.00 City has been supportive of the Plan Bay Area process and specifically the Plan Bay Area allocation, as well as the zoning and financing plans for the TASP 2 History of neighborhood opposition 0.00 0.00 0.00 There has been not neighborhood opposition to pending development proposals or the Plan Bay Area allocations Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 3/26/2013 Page 2 of 4 P:\121000\121113MTC\Readiness_Assessment Process\PDA Readiness Assessment\WK_Readiness Assessments\All_WK_Sample032513
Page 1 and 2:
Draft March 2013 Strategy for a Sus
Page 3 and 4:
Final Report PDA Readiness Assessme
Page 5 and 6:
1. REPORT SUMMARY AND FINDINGS Plan
Page 7 and 8:
Table 1 Summary of PDA Readiness As
Page 9 and 10:
PDA Readiness Assessment Final Repo
Page 11 and 12:
2. STUDY BACKGROUND Over the past s
Page 13 and 14:
3. PDA DEVELOPMENT READINESS ASSESS
Page 15 and 16:
Table 2 Capacity Assessment for Sel
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Table 3 PDA Readiness Criteria Work
Page 21 and 22:
Table 3 PDA Readiness Criteria Work
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
5. POLICY ACTIONS TO IMPROVE DEVELO
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
A-1 Units 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,0
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 2 PDA Readiness Criteria Wor
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
7,000 6,000 5,000 Figure 9: Redwood
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 10 PDA Readiness Criteria Wo
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
7,000 6,000 5,000 Figure 15: Santa
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102: Figure 17 PDA Readiness Criteria Wo
Page 111 and 112: 3,000 2,500 Figure 21: San Mateo El
Page 129 and 130: 140,000 120,000 100,000 Figure 27:
Page 147 and 148: 3,000 2,500 Figure 33: Antioch Hill
Page 151: Figure 34 PDA Readiness Criteria Wo
Page 165 and 166: 5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 Figure 39:
Page 183 and 184: 4,000 3,500 3,000 Figure 45: Pittsb
Page 201 and 202: 2,500 2,000 Figure 51: Morgan Hill
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 Figure 57:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Metropolitan Transportation Commiss
show all

Draft

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?