Draft

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 55 PDA Readiness Criteria Worksheet PDA name: South San Francisco Downtown Version: Baseline # Readiness Criteria Category # Sub-Criterion Name Present (2012) PDA Development Readiness Scoring 2020 2030 2040 Notes B Planning and Entitlement Criteria 1 Displacement of existing stable residential neighborhoods 0.10 0.05 0.00 Some aging residential redevelopment has been identified as "opportunity sites" in calculation of planned capacity. 2 Time required and difficulty in obtaining entitlement: institutional capacity and jurisdictional track record City reports most projects require 3-6 months for entitlement, which is comparatively quick A-164 0.00 0.00 0.00 C Community Support 1 Elected official support for proposed PDA use types and densities during past 3 years 0.00 0.00 0.00 PDA designation unanimous, other PDAs in the City have had highdensity projects approved (Mid-Pen ~80 DU/acre, BART station 50- 80 DU/ac) 2 History of neighborhood opposition Not considered problematic, but stakeholder turnout is improving 0.00 0.00 0.00 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 3/26/2013 Page 2 of 4 P:\121000\121113MTC\Readiness_Assessment Process\PDA Readiness Assessment\DS_Readiness Assessment_032513
Figure 55 PDA Readiness Criteria Worksheet PDA name: South San Francisco Downtown Version: Baseline # Readiness Criteria Category # Sub-Criterion Name Present (2012) PDA Development Readiness Scoring 2020 2030 2040 Notes D Market and Investment Attractiveness 1 History of real estate investment in PDA and surrounding city 0.10 0.05 0.00 City overall has gotten substantial development over 10-year period, especially around BART; limited investment within PDA during this time period. 2 Recent Local Development Activity 0.10 0.00 0.00 Does have pipeline projects in City, not much in PDA. Centennial Village is 280-unit project planned on El Camino Real. Lots of employment development in pipeline (2-3M SF of biotech campus entitled). A-165 3 General Market Conditions 0.00 0.00 0.00 Housing prices have been among the highest in the PDA sample, due to proximity to major job centers within South San Francisco, San Francisco, and the Peninsula 4 Financial Feasibility Constraint 0.00 0.00 0.00 Some developable parcels were purchased by RDA for redevelopment, now in question. Other sites are substantial in size and have low-intensity commercial uses. 5 Parcel size and configuration 0.05 0.05 0.00 Some parcel assembly has already occurred under RDA, and not all opportunity sites are small parcels. 6 Existence of major investment disincentives 0.10 0.05 0.00 Schools are decent; problematic access to Caltrain station that is planned for improvement; crime has been an increasing issue in recent years. Downtown Plan and continued development are expected to lessen these issues over time. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 3/26/2013 Page 3 of 4 P:\121000\121113MTC\Readiness_Assessment Process\PDA Readiness Assessment\DS_Readiness Assessment_032513
Page 1 and 2:
Draft March 2013 Strategy for a Sus
Page 3 and 4:
Final Report PDA Readiness Assessme
Page 5 and 6:
1. REPORT SUMMARY AND FINDINGS Plan
Page 7 and 8:
Table 1 Summary of PDA Readiness As
Page 9 and 10:
PDA Readiness Assessment Final Repo
Page 11 and 12:
2. STUDY BACKGROUND Over the past s
Page 13 and 14:
3. PDA DEVELOPMENT READINESS ASSESS
Page 15 and 16:
Table 2 Capacity Assessment for Sel
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Table 3 PDA Readiness Criteria Work
Page 21 and 22:
Table 3 PDA Readiness Criteria Work
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
5. POLICY ACTIONS TO IMPROVE DEVELO
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
A-1 Units 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,0
Page 51 and 52:
Figure 2 PDA Readiness Criteria Wor
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
7,000 6,000 5,000 Figure 9: Redwood
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 10 PDA Readiness Criteria Wo
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
7,000 6,000 5,000 Figure 15: Santa
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
3,000 2,500 Figure 21: San Mateo El
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
140,000 120,000 100,000 Figure 27:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
3,000 2,500 Figure 33: Antioch Hill
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162: Figure 38 PDA Readiness Criteria Wo
Page 165 and 166: 5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 Figure 39:
Page 183 and 184: 4,000 3,500 3,000 Figure 45: Pittsb
Page 201 and 202: 2,500 2,000 Figure 51: Morgan Hill
Page 211: Figure 55 PDA Readiness Criteria Wo
Page 219 and 220: 5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 Figure 57:
Page 229 and 230: Metropolitan Transportation Commiss
show all

Draft

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?