Play-Persona: Modeling Player Behaviour in Computer Games
Play-Persona: Modeling Player Behaviour in Computer Games
Play-Persona: Modeling Player Behaviour in Computer Games
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In a quantitative approach towards f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g clusters of player behaviors, Drachen, Canossa and<br />
Yannakakis [12] utilized an Evolv<strong>in</strong>g Self-Organiz<strong>in</strong>g Map (a form of Korhonen neural network) to<br />
analyze data from a small sample of 1365 players of TRU, all of whom had completed the game.<br />
The analysis considered six variables (completion time, numbers of deaths, death by fall<strong>in</strong>g, death<br />
by enemy, death by environment and the use of the Help-on-demand system). Four clusters of<br />
behavior were located (table 1) based on the core mechanics of the game encompass<strong>in</strong>g more than<br />
90% of the exam<strong>in</strong>ed players. Each group was rated on a low-average-high scale, which is based<br />
on the underly<strong>in</strong>g range <strong>in</strong> the gameplay metrics. Each group was given a metaphorical label, which<br />
serves to provide an illustration of the core behavior of the group, and is essential when<br />
communicat<strong>in</strong>g results of an analysis to the design team <strong>in</strong> a game development company.<br />
Veterans Solvers Pacifists Runners<br />
Death count low average n/a average/low<br />
Completion time low average/high average/low low<br />
Death by fall<strong>in</strong>g low high average/high average/low<br />
Death by enemy low average/low high high<br />
Death by environment high low low High<br />
Help on demand average/low low low high / low<br />
Table 1: the four clusters of player behaviour accord<strong>in</strong>g to the game metrics tracked<br />
Veterans: These players where characterized by low death counts, fast completion times and very<br />
few deaths by enemies or fall<strong>in</strong>g, and low numbers of request for help <strong>in</strong> solv<strong>in</strong>g puzzles. The only<br />
weakness was environment related deaths, which this group handled rather badly. A closer look at<br />
the metrics data could be utilized to locate the specific areas or traps where this otherwise very well<br />
perform<strong>in</strong>g group ran <strong>in</strong>to problems.<br />
Solvers: This group of players where characterized by very low numbers of requests for help <strong>in</strong><br />
solv<strong>in</strong>g puzzles, but average to high numbers of death by fall<strong>in</strong>g and enemies. Completion time was<br />
average. Perhaps surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, environment-related deaths were low, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g careful navigation<br />
through the environment.<br />
Pacifists: These players are characterized by average numbers of death to environment and fall<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
but low numbers of death to environment effects such as traps, and low numbers of requests for<br />
help, and very high numbers of deaths by enemies. These players generally navigate the game well,<br />
but are very bad at handl<strong>in</strong>g mobile threats.<br />
266