07.12.2012 Views

Play-Persona: Modeling Player Behaviour in Computer Games

Play-Persona: Modeling Player Behaviour in Computer Games

Play-Persona: Modeling Player Behaviour in Computer Games

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ARTICLE 1 - TOWARDS A THEORY OF THE PLAYER: DESIGNING<br />

FOR EXPERIENCE<br />

Article presented at DIGRA 2007 <strong>in</strong> Tokyo, Japan.<br />

Abstract<br />

This article <strong>in</strong>tends to sketch a theory of the player draw<strong>in</strong>g from psychological personality theories<br />

(Assagioli’s Psychosynthesis), neurophysiologic studies (Damasio and Pert) and previous work on<br />

player’s theory with the purpose of trac<strong>in</strong>g a functional procedure for design<strong>in</strong>g game worlds. I will<br />

make use of the concept of sub-personalities to show how potentially, all player-types coexist<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the implied player. Once player types are <strong>in</strong>dividuated I <strong>in</strong>tend to show how a “flow” path for<br />

each one of them can be planned and <strong>in</strong>cluded dur<strong>in</strong>g the design phase of game worlds.<br />

Keywords<br />

<strong>Play</strong>er, experience, emotion, personality, sub-personality, psychosynthesis, player types, flow, level<br />

design, game worlds.<br />

1 Introduction<br />

Why is it necessary to <strong>in</strong>vestigate player behaviour when the ma<strong>in</strong> concern is to draft guidel<strong>in</strong>es for<br />

the realization of levels <strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle player action games?<br />

“If level designers <strong>in</strong>tend to shape game environments with a higher emotional valence that will<br />

eventually trigger a def<strong>in</strong>ed player experience, they are forced to look at the avatar’s behaviour <strong>in</strong><br />

the game as a direct manifestation of the player’s personality.”[30]<br />

It becomes apparent how the relationship between personality, experience and emotion assumes a<br />

central focus. I am go<strong>in</strong>g to give a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary def<strong>in</strong>ition of these three key concepts, allow<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

an eventual later revision.<br />

<strong>Persona</strong>lity <strong>in</strong> type theory is understood as a representation of a particular pattern of basic<br />

elements. Special attention is devoted to what the <strong>in</strong>dividuals have <strong>in</strong> common. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

trait theory, personality is a compendium of traits or characteristic ways of behav<strong>in</strong>g, th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

feel<strong>in</strong>g. The focus here is on the differences between <strong>in</strong>dividuals. These two theories, as the two<br />

sides of the same co<strong>in</strong>, are <strong>in</strong>terchangeable and <strong>in</strong>tegrated with each other [26]. For our purpose<br />

we can def<strong>in</strong>e personality as consist<strong>in</strong>g of certa<strong>in</strong> recognizable and reoccurr<strong>in</strong>g patterns. These<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!