Abstracts
IAH_CNC_WEB2
IAH_CNC_WEB2
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Hugh C. Simpson<br />
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Guelph, Ontario, Canada<br />
School of Environmental Design and Rural Development, University of Guelph, Guelph,<br />
Ontario, Canada<br />
Robert C. de Loë<br />
Department of Environment and Resource Studies, University of Waterloo, Waterloo,<br />
Ontario, Canada<br />
Historically, the development and implementation of groundwater policy has been guided<br />
almost exclusively by expert science and traditional risk analysis. This approach has worked<br />
well for environmental problems that are relatively simple and predictable. Unfortunately,<br />
many of the environmental problems that are being faced by decision makers can be classified<br />
as complex problems.<br />
Examples include the management and protection or groundwater resources. Complex environmental<br />
problems are a particular challenge because they are ‘quasi-scientific’, requiring<br />
more than scientific knowledge needs to be considered during the problem-solving process.<br />
Current research indicates that a broader and more inclusive risk analysis approach is needed<br />
for addressing complex environmental problems. A key part of this broader approach<br />
is involving members of affected communities so that local experiential knowledge, and<br />
societal beliefs and values, can be incorporated with expert science during the discussion<br />
and negotiation of solutions to complex problems. This is a difficult challenge for the<br />
expert science community, and requires a shift from the inwardly-focused traditional approach<br />
to a more open and inclusive process for groundwater policy development and<br />
implementation.<br />
This paper explores elements of the paradigm shift that appears to be taking place in the<br />
development and implementation of groundwater policy. First, the criteria that qualify<br />
groundwater management and protection as a complex environmental problem are presented.<br />
Second, an alternative to the traditional approach – collaborative environmental<br />
problem-solving – is discussed. Finally, some examples of how collaborative environmental<br />
problem-solving is being implemented into groundwater policy are presented.<br />
124 - Implementing Source Protection in York Region<br />
Scott Lister<br />
York Region, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada<br />
This talk will discuss the preparation for implementation of Part IV of the Clean Water<br />
Act’s source water protection requirements in York Region. This will include a discussion<br />
of tools and techniques used to identify, investigate and manage over 1,000 water quality<br />
threats to drinking water sources in York Region, Ontario, focusing on protection of forty-one<br />
municipal drinking water wells. Threats were investigated using several methods<br />
of outreach, including site visits with business owners and farmers to complete surveys.<br />
Generally speaking, under the proposed Source Protection Plans existing threats must be<br />
managed using Risk Management Plans (RMPs), while proposed activities that would be<br />
IAH-CNC 2015 WATERLOO CONFERENCE<br />
121