29.10.2015 Views

Abstracts

IAH_CNC_WEB2

IAH_CNC_WEB2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hugh C. Simpson<br />

Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Guelph, Ontario, Canada<br />

School of Environmental Design and Rural Development, University of Guelph, Guelph,<br />

Ontario, Canada<br />

Robert C. de Loë<br />

Department of Environment and Resource Studies, University of Waterloo, Waterloo,<br />

Ontario, Canada<br />

Historically, the development and implementation of groundwater policy has been guided<br />

almost exclusively by expert science and traditional risk analysis. This approach has worked<br />

well for environmental problems that are relatively simple and predictable. Unfortunately,<br />

many of the environmental problems that are being faced by decision makers can be classified<br />

as complex problems.<br />

Examples include the management and protection or groundwater resources. Complex environmental<br />

problems are a particular challenge because they are ‘quasi-scientific’, requiring<br />

more than scientific knowledge needs to be considered during the problem-solving process.<br />

Current research indicates that a broader and more inclusive risk analysis approach is needed<br />

for addressing complex environmental problems. A key part of this broader approach<br />

is involving members of affected communities so that local experiential knowledge, and<br />

societal beliefs and values, can be incorporated with expert science during the discussion<br />

and negotiation of solutions to complex problems. This is a difficult challenge for the<br />

expert science community, and requires a shift from the inwardly-focused traditional approach<br />

to a more open and inclusive process for groundwater policy development and<br />

implementation.<br />

This paper explores elements of the paradigm shift that appears to be taking place in the<br />

development and implementation of groundwater policy. First, the criteria that qualify<br />

groundwater management and protection as a complex environmental problem are presented.<br />

Second, an alternative to the traditional approach – collaborative environmental<br />

problem-solving – is discussed. Finally, some examples of how collaborative environmental<br />

problem-solving is being implemented into groundwater policy are presented.<br />

124 - Implementing Source Protection in York Region<br />

Scott Lister<br />

York Region, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada<br />

This talk will discuss the preparation for implementation of Part IV of the Clean Water<br />

Act’s source water protection requirements in York Region. This will include a discussion<br />

of tools and techniques used to identify, investigate and manage over 1,000 water quality<br />

threats to drinking water sources in York Region, Ontario, focusing on protection of forty-one<br />

municipal drinking water wells. Threats were investigated using several methods<br />

of outreach, including site visits with business owners and farmers to complete surveys.<br />

Generally speaking, under the proposed Source Protection Plans existing threats must be<br />

managed using Risk Management Plans (RMPs), while proposed activities that would be<br />

IAH-CNC 2015 WATERLOO CONFERENCE<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!