Abstracts
IAH_CNC_WEB2
IAH_CNC_WEB2
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The aquifer is mostly confined; but is exposed at some places along the Assiniboine River<br />
Valley. Initially, the groundwater quality was poor with high chlorides and total dissolved<br />
solids. With the increased pumping, the quality improved. Heavier and evaporitic isotopes<br />
indicated that water from the Assiniboine River was recharging the aquifer.<br />
Two major pumping centers have developed deep drawdown zones in the potentiometric<br />
surface, where some areas indicate a strong recharge boundary from the Assiniboine River.<br />
This recharge boundary sustains the aquifer’s ability to supply large amounts of water.<br />
However, there are groundwater flows moving towards the pumping wells from other areas<br />
which still contain older glaciogenic water. Groundwater sampling shows that the groundwater<br />
in the dynamic zones is improving in quality, and indicates recharge. Over the last<br />
five years drawdown has developed in the western areas of the aquifer due to the pumping<br />
of the City of Brandon emergency supply wells. This new drawdown has dramatically<br />
altered the potentiometric surface and at some places the geochemistry.<br />
Numerous groundwater level observation wells show annual aquifer recharge with normal<br />
seasonal and climatic conditions. The network also records the effects of changing pumping<br />
rates. During the few years on several occasions, the Assiniboine River has reached<br />
flood stage, and the aquifer rises and falls very rapidly to the river water level changes.<br />
The Brandon Channel Aquifer is an important aquifer that provides substantial water<br />
supply for industrial use in the City of Brandon. The recent municipal use of the aquifer,<br />
shows that proper management is required of this complex buried valley aquifer. Therefore<br />
additional groundwater investigations should be undertaken.<br />
184 - Free convection or variable density flow within groundwater<br />
flow systems?<br />
K. Udo Weyer & James C. Ellis<br />
WDA Consultants Inc., Calgary, Alberta, Canada<br />
There exists a scientific conflict between the postulated but unproven existence of free<br />
convection under hydrodynamic on‐shore conditions and the well‐established existence of<br />
gravitational groundwater flow systems under the same conditions. The extensive literature<br />
on free convection indicates that downward directed fingers of higher density fluid may<br />
develop via free convection under hydrostatic laboratory conditions. Numerical codes have<br />
subsequently been developed which model these fingers in an hydrostatic environment.<br />
So far, there has not been any conclusive proof of the field occurrences of free convection<br />
under hydrodynamic on-shore conditions presented, despite strong claims to the contrary.<br />
The claims were mainly based on 2008 geo-electrical field measurements in the shore near<br />
sabkha (salt flat) areas in Abu Dhabi (van Dam et al., 2009).<br />
Repeat geophysical measurements in 2009 did not find the ‘fingers’ which were claimed<br />
to have existed in 2008. Subsequently a prominent proponent of free convection stated<br />
subsequently: “Hundreds of papers on theory, modelling & laboratory experiments on<br />
finger instabilities associated with free convection…. But a complete lack of conclusive<br />
172 IAH-CNC 2015 WATERLOO CONFERENCE