30.01.2016 Views

Worldwide transfer pricing reference guide 2014

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Finland (continued)<br />

Documentation requirements (continued)<br />

Group companies are required to prove the arm’s length nature of cross-border intra-group transactions by preparing <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong><br />

documentation. According to the law, the documentation should contain the following information:<br />

• A description of the business<br />

• A description of associated enterprises<br />

• Information on transactions between associated enterprises<br />

• Functional analysis regarding transactions between associated enterprises<br />

• A comparability analysis, including available information on comparables<br />

• A description of the <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> method and its application<br />

Less extensive documentation is required during a fiscal year if the total amount of transactions between two parties does not exceed<br />

EUR500, 000.<br />

Documentation deadlines<br />

A taxpayer has to submit the <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> documentation for a specific fiscal year within 60 days of a request by the tax authorities,<br />

but not earlier than six months after the end of the financial period. The additional clarifications concerning the documentation have to<br />

be submitted within 90 days of a request by the tax authorities.<br />

Statute of limitations on <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> assessments<br />

The time limit for the adjustment of income due to the failure in applying arm’s length principles to the <strong>pricing</strong> of a transaction is five<br />

years from the beginning of the following year in which the taxation was finalized.<br />

Return disclosures/related party disclosures<br />

Based on Paragraph 26.4 of the Finnish Tax Act on Assessment Procedure, if the other party to the transaction is a non-resident, and if<br />

the tax authorities cannot obtain adequate information on the transaction by using an appropriate international treaty, the taxpayer is<br />

responsible for presenting such information.<br />

Frequency of tax audit and <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> scrutiny by the tax authority<br />

In general, the likelihood of annual tax audit is characterized as low. The likelihood of <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> being reviewed as part of an audit,<br />

and the likelihood of a challenge to the <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> methodology is high.<br />

APA opportunity<br />

Advance rulings are available in Finland. There is no legislation for APAs; however, the tax authorities have indicated their willingness to<br />

utilize them.<br />

Expected reaction to OECD Report on BEPS<br />

As of January <strong>2014</strong>, there are no proposed legislative changes to the tax law or to the documentation requirements regarding <strong>transfer</strong><br />

<strong>pricing</strong>. However, the Finnish tax administration is actively taking part in the discussion concerning BEPS. Being a member country of<br />

OECD, changes to the <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> <strong>guide</strong>lines will subsequently affect Finland.<br />

<strong>Worldwide</strong> <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> <strong>reference</strong> <strong>guide</strong><br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!