Worldwide transfer pricing reference guide 2014
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Canada<br />
Taxing authority and tax law<br />
Taxing authority: The Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) is responsible for ensuring that taxpayers meet the requirements of the law.<br />
Tax law: Section 247 of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (ITA) received Royal Assent on 18 June 1998 and is generally applicable to taxation<br />
years that began after 1997. It constitutes Canada’s <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> legislation and deals with the determination of <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong><br />
adjustments, the re-characterization of transactions, penalties, records/documents required to be made or obtained, contemporaneous<br />
documentation requirements and timing of provision to the Minister when requested, ministerial discretion regarding acceptance of<br />
downward tax adjustment requests, and the application of withholding tax to <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> adjustments.<br />
Relevant regulations and rulings<br />
The CRA does not set out its views and positions on <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> issues by a legal doctrine or by providing detailed examples.<br />
The CRA prefers to outline its views in general principles.<br />
It provides its administrative interpretations and guidance with respect to §247 and its application through the release of Information<br />
Circulars (IC), Transfer Pricing Memoranda (TPM) and pronouncements at public conferences, symposia and conventions. ICs usually<br />
address major subjects from a general perspective, while TPMs typically provide supplementary detailed explanations and guidance on<br />
specific issues related to the major subject.<br />
The CRA’s current key pronouncements on <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> are:<br />
• IC87–2R, International Transfer Pricing, 27 September 1999<br />
• IC94–4R, International Transfer Pricing: Advance Pricing Arrangements (APAs), 16 March 2001<br />
• IC94–4R (Special Release), Advance Pricing Arrangements for Small Businesses, 18 March 2005<br />
• IC71–17R5, Guidance on Competent Authority Assistance Under Canada’s Tax Conventions, 1 January 2005<br />
Additional information and guidance on <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> related matters, including the TPMs, can be obtained from the CRA’s website<br />
(www.cra-arc.gc.ca/tx/nnrsdnts/cmmn/trns/menu-eng.html)<br />
OECD Guidelines treatment<br />
While no mention is made of the OECD Guidelines in §247 of the ITA, the legislative provision is intended to reflect the arm’s length<br />
principle as set out in the OECD Guidelines. The CRA has also endeavored to harmonize its administrative guidance and approach to<br />
<strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong>, with the OECD Guidelines. As noted in IC 87–2R, the “circular sets out the Department’s views on <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> and<br />
also provides the Department’s position with respect to the application of the OECD Guidelines.”<br />
When dealing with <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> issues domestically, reliance is placed on the relevant Canadian statutory provisions. The CRA’s<br />
related IC’s and other administrative guidance are considered instructive but not definitive. The OECD Guidelines and other OECD reports<br />
are not formally recognized as authoritative; however, courts and other dispute resolution channels (e.g., competent authority) will<br />
usually consider the international principles and standards established by the OECD in reaching a decision.<br />
Priorities/<strong>pricing</strong> methods<br />
The CRA accepts the <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> methods recommended in the OECD Guidelines, when such methods are applied correctly and result<br />
in an arm’s length price or allocation. The <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> methods specified in IC 87–2 include: CUP, Resale Price, Cost Plus, Profit Split<br />
(residual/contribution) and TNMM methods.<br />
Traditionally, the CRA considered that, notwithstanding the fact that §247 does not so stipulate, there is a natural hierarchy in the application<br />
of the above-noted <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> methods, with the CUP method providing the most reliable indication of an arm’s length <strong>transfer</strong> price or<br />
allocation, and the Profit Split method providing the least reliable indication of an arm’s length result. Traditionally, the CRA did not require or<br />
impose a “best method” rule.<br />
The CRA believes that the most appropriate method to be used in any situation will be that which provides the highest degree of comparability<br />
between transactions, following an analysis of the hierarchy of methods.<br />
<strong>Worldwide</strong> <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> <strong>reference</strong> <strong>guide</strong><br />
57