30.01.2016 Views

Worldwide transfer pricing reference guide 2014

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sri Lanka<br />

Taxing authority and tax law<br />

Taxing authority: The Department of Inland Revenue (IRD).<br />

Tax law: Section 104 of the Inland Revenue Act, No. 10 of 2006 (IRA).<br />

Relevant regulations and rulings<br />

Transfer <strong>pricing</strong> regulations contained in Extra Ordinary Gazette No. 1823/5 issued on 12 August 2013 under and in terms of Section<br />

104 and 104A of the IRA.<br />

OECD <strong>guide</strong>lines treatment<br />

Although Sri Lanka is not a member of the OECD, the IRD broadly accepts the OECD Guidelines and has largely based its practice on<br />

them. Also, the IRD recognizes the five methods accepted by the OECD Guidelines.<br />

Priorities/<strong>pricing</strong> methods<br />

The IRD recognizes the methods outlined in the OECD Guidelines, which include the traditional transaction methods (CUP, Resale Price<br />

and cost plus) and profit methods (Profit Split and TNMM). The process of selecting a method should be aimed at finding the most<br />

appropriate method. Although the traditional transaction methods may be preferred by the IRD, as they are seen to be the most direct<br />

means of establishing the arm’s length price, the Profit Split method is accepted as an appropriate method in circumstances where<br />

unique intangibles or interrelated transactions exist.<br />

Transfer <strong>pricing</strong> penalties<br />

The IRA does not impute penalties targeted specifically at <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong>, and there are no provisions for applying penalties for a lack<br />

of <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> documentation by itself. However, the IRD is empowered to take punitive action under the IRA on any person who<br />

without a reasonable cause files an incorrect tax return, furnishes any incorrect information, fails to furnish the return on time, fails to<br />

inform chargeability to tax, or makes an incorrect statement. Further, the Assessor can disregard a transaction if he is of the opinion that<br />

it may reduce or would have the effect of reducing the amount of tax payable and hence is artificial or fictitious or does not reflect its<br />

substance. Offenses can be subject to a fine or imprisonment of either description or both fine and imprisonment.<br />

Penalty relief<br />

Where taxpayers have made conscientious efforts to establish <strong>transfer</strong> prices that comply with the arm’s length principle, and have<br />

prepared documentation to evidence such compliance, the IRD is likely to take the view that the taxpayer’s <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> practices<br />

represent a lower tax risk.<br />

Documentation requirements<br />

Transfer <strong>pricing</strong> regulations require extensive contemporaneous documentation. Taxpayers are required to keep all the documents in<br />

English evidencing that related party transactions are established on an arm’s length basis. However, such documentation is required<br />

only if the transaction value exceeds LKR100 million for any year of assessment.<br />

Documentation deadlines<br />

Documentation is generally required upon request. The regulations require taxpayers to retain documents for a period of five years.<br />

Statute of limitations on <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> assessments<br />

The statute of limitations is of two years if the return is duly filed within the deadline of 30 November. However, the statute of limitation<br />

will not apply in case of fraud or willful evasion.<br />

<strong>Worldwide</strong> <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> <strong>reference</strong> <strong>guide</strong><br />

282

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!