Worldwide transfer pricing reference guide 2014
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Slovak Republic (continued)<br />
Documentation requirements (continued)<br />
For taxpayers obliged to use IFRS (banks, insurance companies, pension funds, companies exceeding a certain size), the Guidance<br />
prescribes the required contents of the <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> documentation, which is generally in line with the Masterfile approach set<br />
out by the EU Code of Conduct on Transfer Pricing Documentation. The documentation should consist of global (Masterfile) and local<br />
documentation. The Masterfile has to contain information with regard to the whole group of related parties (overview of the industry,<br />
business strategies and general overview of functions, risks and assets of the members of the group). The local documentation should<br />
contain information regarding the Slovak taxpayer. Moreover, the approach to <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> methods used, and description of<br />
transactions with related parties should be covered by the documentation. The local documentation should also include analysis of the<br />
comparability of the transactions.<br />
For other taxpayers, the Guidance does not stipulate the contents of the documentation. However, the <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> documentation<br />
must prove that prices applied in related party transactions conform to the arm’s length principle.<br />
The language of the documentation should be Slovak, unless otherwise approved at the taxpayer’s request. The tax authorities have<br />
stated that documentation presented in English, German or French should also be accepted. There is positive experience with submitting<br />
documentation in English.<br />
It is not clear from the Guidance whether the documentation requirements apply for transactions performed or contracts concluded<br />
prior to 1 January 2009. However, the tax authorities already require taxpayers to have sufficient <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> documentation<br />
prepared in the case of a tax audit. This stems from the provision of the Income Tax Act stipulating that the burden of proof rests with<br />
the taxpayer.<br />
Documentation deadlines<br />
If requested by the tax authorities, <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> documentation must be submitted within 15 days of the request. The documentation<br />
does not have to be disclosed unless requested by the tax authorities. As of January <strong>2014</strong>, submission of documentation may be<br />
required without opening a tax audit prior to the request.<br />
Statute of limitations on <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> assessments<br />
The statute of limitations in Slovakia in the case of applying a double tax treaty is 10 years from the end of the year in which the tax<br />
return is filed.<br />
Return disclosures/related party disclosures<br />
Transfer <strong>pricing</strong> documentation does not need to be enclosed with the tax return. The taxpayer should state (on a specific row of the<br />
tax return) the difference (if any) between the prices charged in transactions with related parties and the arm’s length prices that<br />
decreased the tax base. The tax base must be at the same time increased by this difference.<br />
The corporate income tax return includes a summary table where the amounts of various types of related party sales and purchases<br />
must be stated (regardless of whether there are divergences from arm’s length prices).<br />
Transfer <strong>pricing</strong>-specific returns<br />
There are no <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong>-specific returns in Slovakia.<br />
Frequency of tax audit and <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> scrutiny by the tax authority<br />
In general, the likelihood of a corporate income tax audit in Slovakia is high, while the likelihood that the taxpayer’s related party<br />
transactions will be reviewed as part of that audit is medium to high.<br />
Based on experience with <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> audits in Slovakia, if <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> is reviewed as part of the tax audit, the risk of a challenge<br />
by the Slovak tax authorities to the taxpayer’s methodology is also medium.<br />
Following the introduction of the obligation to prepare and keep <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> documentation, the tax authority has intensified its<br />
activity in the area of <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> and is increasingly focused on the <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> and related documentation when auditing<br />
<strong>Worldwide</strong> <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> <strong>reference</strong> <strong>guide</strong><br />
267