Worldwide transfer pricing reference guide 2014
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Italy<br />
Taxing authority and tax law<br />
Taxing authority: Amministrazione Finanziaria (Administration of Finance and Revenue Authority, or AFRA).<br />
Tax law and decrees: Embedded within the Presidential Decree no. 917 of 22 December 1986 (Decree 917 or Consolidated Corporate<br />
Income Tax Code), where <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> is regulated in Article 110 (7) and Article 9 (3)–(4) for Corporate Income Tax (IRES).<br />
On 23 December 2013, the Italian Parliament passed the budget law for <strong>2014</strong> (<strong>2014</strong> Stability Law, published in the Official Gazette<br />
no. 302 of 27 December 2013), which includes clarifications on the application of the <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> rules to the determination of the<br />
Regional Tax on Productive Activities (IRAP) taxable base (which is regulated by Legislative Decree no. 446 of 15 December 1997), also<br />
for the tax years following the one in progress at 31 December 2007.<br />
Relevant regulations and rulings<br />
Legislative Decree no. 78 of 31 May 2010 (Decree 78) introduced an optional <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> documentation provision in the Italian tax<br />
law. Article 26 outlines that if the taxpayer provides tax authorities with proper <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> documentation during a tax assessment,<br />
no tax penalties (currently varying from 100% to 200% of the additional taxes) will be applied on possible tax adjustments, should the tax<br />
authority determine the intercompany transactions are not in compliance with the arm’s length standard.<br />
On 29 September 2010, the Commissionaire of the Italian Revenue Agency released the “provvedimento” (operational instructions)<br />
to implement the provisions endorsed in Article 1 (2–ter) of Legislative Decree no. 471, which was enacted on 18 December 1997<br />
(Decree 471). The new documentation regime is commented on in Circular Letter 58/E, dated 15 December 2010 (Circular 58/E),<br />
which provides interesting insights.<br />
The documentation regime innovates the way Italy traditionally looked at <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong>. However, there are some grey areas still<br />
left. Compliance with the Italian <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> documentation regime is not mandatory. In this respect, taxpayers are expected to<br />
make a strategic management decision, taking into consideration that the penalty protection is only afforded if there is complete and<br />
appropriate <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> documentation in place. If not, maximum penalties apply. The <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> documentation format must<br />
follow the one provided by the law, must be in Italian, and its contents must be detailed enough to provide officers with a substantial view<br />
of the intercompany flows and related policies.<br />
The instructions basically implement the EU Code of Conduct on <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> and also follow the OECD approach. It also contains very<br />
specific requirements for properly assembling the <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> file. Compliance with the instructions will protect taxpayers from tax<br />
penalties on adjustments arising from <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> audits. Current provisions provide for very high penalties, ranging from 100% to<br />
200% of any additional taxes. Among the most significant implications of the new requirements are that taxpayers must:<br />
• Assess the Italian entity’s type to determine the proper documentation to be prepared for penalty avoidance<br />
• Advise the tax authority as to the existence of current <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> documentation for the current tax year with the filing of the<br />
tax return<br />
• Advise the tax authority as to the existence of <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> documentation for open tax years before 29 December 2010<br />
• Have country specific documentation prepared, regardless of whether there is a Masterfile<br />
• Take steps to avoid a challenge by the tax authority based on incomplete or false documentation, which could negate penalty protection<br />
The taxpayer’s notice to the tax authority, indicating that <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> documentation exists for FY2010 (and subsequent fiscal years),<br />
must be filed annually, along with the tax return. For prior fiscal years subject to tax audits, a similar notice should have been provided by<br />
28 December 2010. Late notices will only be deemed effective as long as they are filed prior to the beginning of any tax inspection.<br />
Strategic risk management decisions need to be made by each taxpayer, possibly in coordination with central management.<br />
It is not clear whether and to what extent previous Circular Letter nos. 32/9/2267 of 22 September 1980 (Circular 32/9/2267) and<br />
42/12/1587 of 12 December 1981 (Circular 42/12/1587) is still valid (at least as internal administrative <strong>guide</strong>lines).<br />
Circular Letter no. 1 of 20 October 1998 outlines general methods for tax audits and includes <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> in the framework of<br />
regular audits of multinational enterprises.<br />
Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) Decision no. 22023 of 13 October 2006 notes that the burden of proof rests on the tax<br />
authority for <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> issues. According to the Supreme Court, and subsequently confirmed by the 2010 OECD Guidelines, where<br />
<strong>Worldwide</strong> <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> <strong>reference</strong> <strong>guide</strong><br />
155