Worldwide transfer pricing reference guide 2014
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Spain<br />
Taxing authority and tax law<br />
Taxing authority: State Agency of Tax Administration (AEAT) and General Directorate of Taxation (DGT).<br />
Tax law: Spanish Consolidated Corporate Income Tax Law (CCITL), Article 16.<br />
Relevant regulations and rulings<br />
On 18 November 2008, by Royal Decree, the Spanish Government approved and published regulations that specify <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong><br />
documentation requirements (Royal Decree 1793/2008) applicable to persons or entities participating in related party transactions.<br />
Transfer <strong>pricing</strong> documentation requirements have been in effect in Spain since 2006 (following Law 36/2006, applicable to tax<br />
periods beginning 1 December 2006). This includes a shift in the burden of proof to the taxpayer and a change in the penalty regime.<br />
However, the law did not include a detailed description of what the documentation should contain, except to say that it had to reflect the<br />
arm’s length principle and that the arm’s length test should be based on one of the methods specified in the law (i.e., CUP, Cost Plus,<br />
Resale Price, TNMM and Profit Split).<br />
Regarding <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> penalties, the Royal Decree-Law 6/2010 (approved on 9 April 2010) introduces amendments modifying<br />
the penalty amounts for companies that meet certain criteria. The Royal Decree 897/2010 (approved on 9 July 2010) and the Royal<br />
Decree-Law 13/2010 (approved on 3 December 2010) introduce certain amendments consisting of exemptions to <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong><br />
documentation requirements.<br />
OECD <strong>guide</strong>lines treatment<br />
Spanish <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> legislation explicitly endorses the application of the OECD Guidelines and those of the European Union Joint<br />
Transfer Pricing Forum (EUJTPF).<br />
Priorities/<strong>pricing</strong> methods<br />
The law establishes that, in order to determine the market value, one of the following methods should be applied: CUP, Cost Plus or<br />
Resale Price. These methods are on the same preferential level in the valuation method hierarchy.<br />
Given the complexity of certain transactions or the availability of information relating to the transactions, the above methods may not be<br />
applicable, and TNMM or Profit Split may be used.<br />
In practice, TNMM is commonly applied in case of both audits and APAs.<br />
Transfer <strong>pricing</strong> penalties<br />
Failure to comply with the documentation requirements specified in the new regulations may result in major penalties. These penalties<br />
can result from not maintaining proper documentation and/or from not applying the arm’s length principle (market value).<br />
When the assessment does not produce a tax adjustment, the penalty will be EUR1,500 per fact, or EUR15,000 per group of omitted,<br />
inaccurate, or false facts.<br />
When the tax authorities adjust the <strong>pricing</strong> of a transaction, the penalty may be up to 15% of the gross adjustment.<br />
There will be no penalties where the obligation to document has been complied with, even if the tax authorities reassess the value of<br />
transactions.<br />
In addition to the above, the new regulations also include the applicability of “secondary adjustments” (i.e., in those transactions where<br />
both values will have, for the related parties, a tax treatment that corresponds to the nature of the profit realized). The law makes a<br />
clarification for cases where the link is defined in light of the relationship between the shareholder and the entity, the difference shall<br />
(in proportion to the entity’s degree of participation) be considered as:<br />
• Dividends, whenever such difference is in favor of the shareholder<br />
• Contributions by the shareholder to the entity’s equity, whenever the difference is in favor of the entity<br />
The above sanctions are compatible with aggravating circumstances such as resisting, obstructing, excusing or negating the tax<br />
authorities’ actions.<br />
<strong>Worldwide</strong> <strong>transfer</strong> <strong>pricing</strong> <strong>reference</strong> <strong>guide</strong><br />
278