08.12.2012 Views

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Harm / protection (%)<br />

20<br />

0<br />

-20<br />

-40<br />

-60<br />

-80<br />

-100<br />

-120<br />

-140<br />

Protection<br />

Harm<br />

0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0<br />

Year of follow-up<br />

Figure 69. Protection from BCG vaccination in Chingleput, India during followup.<br />

765<br />

Canadian Indians<br />

Chile<br />

Per cent protection<br />

Protection conferred by BCG vaccination across various age groups<br />

Of the seven clinical trials studying protective efficacy across a wide range<br />

of age groups, with a preponderance of persons other than infants, two<br />

showed a high level of protection, of around 80%, while all of the others<br />

showed little or no protection (figure 71). 738,763-765,767,768,781-787<br />

These observations reconfirm that utilization of BCG vaccination in<br />

age groups other than infants is rarely an effective intervention.<br />

One retrospective study from the Gambia reported that 35 patients<br />

among 200 without a BCG scar died during chemotherapy, while none of<br />

114<br />

Any age<br />

Case-control<br />

Adults<br />

Case-control<br />

-400 -100 0 30 50 80 90 95<br />

Figure 70. Results from retrospective studies on the efficacy of BCG vaccination<br />

against tuberculosis in adults. 779,780

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!