Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002
Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002
Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 11. Preventive therapy – effectiveness. Effectiveness of preventive therapy<br />
in dependence of risk of tuberculosis, efficacy of treatment regimen, <strong>and</strong> adherence<br />
to the regimen. All parameters are shown as fractions. Risk of tuberculosis<br />
is allowed to vary from 0.05 (estimated cumulative risk subsequent to the first five<br />
years following infection) to 0.30 (estimated cumulative risk of a person dually infected<br />
with M. tuberculosis <strong>and</strong> HIV).<br />
Risk Efficacy Adherence Overall Number to treat<br />
of tuberculosis of regimen to treatment effectiveness to prevent 1 case<br />
0.05 0.60 0.30 0.009 111<br />
0.10 0.60 0.30 0.018 56<br />
0.30 0.60 0.30 0.054 19<br />
0.30 0.90 0.30 0.081 12<br />
0.30 0.90 0.50 0.135 7<br />
0.30 0.90 0.80 0.216 5<br />
impact on overall operational effectiveness. The risks of tuberculosis shown<br />
here are <strong>for</strong> persons with long-st<strong>and</strong>ing tuberculous infection, recently<br />
acquired tuberculous infection <strong>and</strong> concomitant HIV infection (0.05, 0.10,<br />
<strong>and</strong> 0.30 <strong>for</strong> the respective risks of tuberculosis). Efficacy examples have<br />
been taken from isoniazid-preventive chemotherapy ranges, <strong>and</strong> adherence<br />
has been made up to vary as might be expected among different patients<br />
with a condition that is not symptomatic. The overall effectiveness is the<br />
product of these three variables <strong>and</strong> the number of patients that must be<br />
treated to prevent one case is the reciprocal value of effectiveness. The<br />
example shows that effectiveness will greatly vary depending on the selection<br />
of patients, the type of regimen <strong>and</strong> the extent to which patients adhere<br />
to treatment. Although reality is not quite as straight<strong>for</strong>ward as in this<br />
example (it assumes that each component proportionally reduces effectiveness),<br />
it may help in deciding under which circumstances preventive<br />
chemotherapy is to be recommended. The specific indication will depend<br />
on the availability of resources, as the overall effectiveness is, under any<br />
circumstance, relatively modest. Not accounted <strong>for</strong> in this model is the<br />
probability of tuberculous infection actually being present when a “positive”<br />
tuberculin skin test is recorded.<br />
A study in Kampala, Ug<strong>and</strong>a, ascertained the operational feasibility<br />
<strong>and</strong> effectiveness of preventive chemotherapy in a high-risk population,<br />
apparently motivated to attend voluntary testing sites <strong>for</strong> HIV. 905 Among<br />
patients who were found to be HIV-positive, only about 60% returned to<br />
obtain their result <strong>and</strong> to receive counseling (figure 89) <strong>and</strong> of these only<br />
144