08.12.2012 Views

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 11. Preventive therapy – effectiveness. Effectiveness of preventive therapy<br />

in dependence of risk of tuberculosis, efficacy of treatment regimen, <strong>and</strong> adherence<br />

to the regimen. All parameters are shown as fractions. Risk of tuberculosis<br />

is allowed to vary from 0.05 (estimated cumulative risk subsequent to the first five<br />

years following infection) to 0.30 (estimated cumulative risk of a person dually infected<br />

with M. tuberculosis <strong>and</strong> HIV).<br />

Risk Efficacy Adherence Overall Number to treat<br />

of tuberculosis of regimen to treatment effectiveness to prevent 1 case<br />

0.05 0.60 0.30 0.009 111<br />

0.10 0.60 0.30 0.018 56<br />

0.30 0.60 0.30 0.054 19<br />

0.30 0.90 0.30 0.081 12<br />

0.30 0.90 0.50 0.135 7<br />

0.30 0.90 0.80 0.216 5<br />

impact on overall operational effectiveness. The risks of tuberculosis shown<br />

here are <strong>for</strong> persons with long-st<strong>and</strong>ing tuberculous infection, recently<br />

acquired tuberculous infection <strong>and</strong> concomitant HIV infection (0.05, 0.10,<br />

<strong>and</strong> 0.30 <strong>for</strong> the respective risks of tuberculosis). Efficacy examples have<br />

been taken from isoniazid-preventive chemotherapy ranges, <strong>and</strong> adherence<br />

has been made up to vary as might be expected among different patients<br />

with a condition that is not symptomatic. The overall effectiveness is the<br />

product of these three variables <strong>and</strong> the number of patients that must be<br />

treated to prevent one case is the reciprocal value of effectiveness. The<br />

example shows that effectiveness will greatly vary depending on the selection<br />

of patients, the type of regimen <strong>and</strong> the extent to which patients adhere<br />

to treatment. Although reality is not quite as straight<strong>for</strong>ward as in this<br />

example (it assumes that each component proportionally reduces effectiveness),<br />

it may help in deciding under which circumstances preventive<br />

chemotherapy is to be recommended. The specific indication will depend<br />

on the availability of resources, as the overall effectiveness is, under any<br />

circumstance, relatively modest. Not accounted <strong>for</strong> in this model is the<br />

probability of tuberculous infection actually being present when a “positive”<br />

tuberculin skin test is recorded.<br />

A study in Kampala, Ug<strong>and</strong>a, ascertained the operational feasibility<br />

<strong>and</strong> effectiveness of preventive chemotherapy in a high-risk population,<br />

apparently motivated to attend voluntary testing sites <strong>for</strong> HIV. 905 Among<br />

patients who were found to be HIV-positive, only about 60% returned to<br />

obtain their result <strong>and</strong> to receive counseling (figure 89) <strong>and</strong> of these only<br />

144

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!