08.12.2012 Views

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Patients with sputum smear-positive tuberculosis or severe extrapulmonary<br />

tuberculosis never treated be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>for</strong> as much as one month;<br />

• Patients with other <strong>for</strong>ms of tuberculosis (sputum smear-negative <strong>and</strong><br />

extrapulmonary) never treated be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>for</strong> as much as one month;<br />

• Patients with sputum smear-positive tuberculosis treated previously <strong>for</strong><br />

one month or more (return after treatment failure, return after default,<br />

<strong>and</strong> relapse).<br />

No specific recommendations have been made on how to deal with patients<br />

with continued bacteriologically active disease following a full re-treatment<br />

course (chronic excretors).<br />

A primary objective of any tuberculosis control program must be to<br />

limit to the largest possible extent the emergence of organisms resistant to<br />

the available medications. This is a guiding principle <strong>for</strong> any chemotherapy,<br />

but it is particularly crucial in tuberculosis control, because the armamentarium<br />

of drugs is limited <strong>and</strong> the prospects in the near future <strong>for</strong> new,<br />

af<strong>for</strong>dable drugs with an efficacy comparable to that of isoniazid, rifampicin<br />

or pyrazinamide are slim <strong>for</strong> most low-income countries.<br />

Choice of first-line regimen<br />

First-line regimens of six to eight months duration are the most efficacious<br />

available. All are based on a four-drug initial intensive phase. Whether<br />

a four-month (with rifampicin) or a six-month continuation phase (without<br />

rifampicin) is selected depends on the availability of resources <strong>for</strong> drugs<br />

<strong>and</strong> personnel, <strong>and</strong> considerations about the fall-back (re-treatment) regimen,<br />

particularly in the case of treatment failure. Twelve-month regimens<br />

(without rifampicin) have been widely used <strong>for</strong> bacteriologically unconfirmed<br />

disease, but their efficacy in HIV-infected patients appears to be<br />

inferior to the shorter, but more intensive alternatives.<br />

The continuation phase in the eight-month regimen consists of six<br />

months of isoniazid plus thioacetazone. A frequently chosen alternative to<br />

thioacetazone is ethambutol. This change potentially weakens the re-treatment<br />

regimen (functional rifampicin monotherapy in the continuation<br />

phase). This increases the risk of development of multidrug resistance.<br />

The IUATLD there<strong>for</strong>e recommends the addition of pyrazinamide throughout<br />

the re-treatment regimen 8 when ethambutol has been used in the continuation<br />

phase of initial treatment.<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!