Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002
Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002
Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• Patients with sputum smear-positive tuberculosis or severe extrapulmonary<br />
tuberculosis never treated be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>for</strong> as much as one month;<br />
• Patients with other <strong>for</strong>ms of tuberculosis (sputum smear-negative <strong>and</strong><br />
extrapulmonary) never treated be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>for</strong> as much as one month;<br />
• Patients with sputum smear-positive tuberculosis treated previously <strong>for</strong><br />
one month or more (return after treatment failure, return after default,<br />
<strong>and</strong> relapse).<br />
No specific recommendations have been made on how to deal with patients<br />
with continued bacteriologically active disease following a full re-treatment<br />
course (chronic excretors).<br />
A primary objective of any tuberculosis control program must be to<br />
limit to the largest possible extent the emergence of organisms resistant to<br />
the available medications. This is a guiding principle <strong>for</strong> any chemotherapy,<br />
but it is particularly crucial in tuberculosis control, because the armamentarium<br />
of drugs is limited <strong>and</strong> the prospects in the near future <strong>for</strong> new,<br />
af<strong>for</strong>dable drugs with an efficacy comparable to that of isoniazid, rifampicin<br />
or pyrazinamide are slim <strong>for</strong> most low-income countries.<br />
Choice of first-line regimen<br />
First-line regimens of six to eight months duration are the most efficacious<br />
available. All are based on a four-drug initial intensive phase. Whether<br />
a four-month (with rifampicin) or a six-month continuation phase (without<br />
rifampicin) is selected depends on the availability of resources <strong>for</strong> drugs<br />
<strong>and</strong> personnel, <strong>and</strong> considerations about the fall-back (re-treatment) regimen,<br />
particularly in the case of treatment failure. Twelve-month regimens<br />
(without rifampicin) have been widely used <strong>for</strong> bacteriologically unconfirmed<br />
disease, but their efficacy in HIV-infected patients appears to be<br />
inferior to the shorter, but more intensive alternatives.<br />
The continuation phase in the eight-month regimen consists of six<br />
months of isoniazid plus thioacetazone. A frequently chosen alternative to<br />
thioacetazone is ethambutol. This change potentially weakens the re-treatment<br />
regimen (functional rifampicin monotherapy in the continuation<br />
phase). This increases the risk of development of multidrug resistance.<br />
The IUATLD there<strong>for</strong>e recommends the addition of pyrazinamide throughout<br />
the re-treatment regimen 8 when ethambutol has been used in the continuation<br />
phase of initial treatment.<br />
79