Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002
Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002
Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Because BCG vaccination is given early in life, the protection af<strong>for</strong>ded<br />
is limited in time, <strong>and</strong> its effect on bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis<br />
in adults is inconsistent, it cannot be expected to have a great impact<br />
on the epidemiology of tuberculosis. 858,859<br />
It seems inappropriate to conclude from meta-analyses that BCG provides<br />
some average protection. 791,792 The observed range in protection is<br />
real <strong>and</strong> remains largely unexplained.<br />
In light of the evidence, WHO recommends its use in newborn children<br />
or as early in life as possible. 793,860 This is still sound policy <strong>for</strong> those<br />
countries in the world where tuberculosis is highly prevalent, <strong>and</strong> tuberculous<br />
meningitis is a frequent, disabling or fatal occurrence. It fails to<br />
address the role of BCG where tuberculosis in children has become a rare<br />
occurrence.<br />
The IUATLD has developed recommendations on criteria <strong>for</strong> the discontinuation<br />
of mass BCG vaccination. 861 Three key issues enter into the<br />
decision making process on the discontinuation of BCG vaccination.<br />
The first is the extent of protection BCG actually imparts in a given<br />
location. In the USA, the low efficacy of BCG vaccination in Georgia,<br />
Georgia-Alabama, <strong>and</strong> Puerto Rico had an important impact on the decision<br />
not to routinely utilize BCG vaccination. As such prospective studies<br />
are usually beyond the realm of resource availability, effectiveness<br />
might alternatively be studied utilizing the case-control or contact study<br />
approach.<br />
The second is the frequency of serious <strong>for</strong>ms of tuberculosis in children<br />
(meningitis, disseminated <strong>for</strong>ms) weighted against the frequency of<br />
adverse reactions from the vaccine itself. This has been best studied in<br />
Sweden where the frequency of serious adverse reactions from BCG vaccination<br />
(osteoarticular <strong>and</strong> disseminated mycobacteriosis due to BCG) outweighed<br />
the incidence of cases that the vaccine was intended to prevent<br />
(figure 76). 703 Similarly, BCG vaccination may become non-cost-effective<br />
as the frequency of childhood tuberculosis decreases, so that an increasing<br />
number of children need to be vaccinated to prevent one case.<br />
The third consideration is the value attached to the preservation of the<br />
utility of the interpretation of tuberculin skin test results. BCG vaccination<br />
induces tuberculin sensitivity <strong>and</strong> complicates the interpretation of tuberculin<br />
skin testing results. In industrialized countries with an elimination<br />
strategy in mind, the tuberculin skin test is an important means of identifying<br />
persons with tuberculous infection at a high risk of progression to<br />
tuberculosis who would benefit from preventive chemotherapy.<br />
124