08.12.2012 Views

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Because BCG vaccination is given early in life, the protection af<strong>for</strong>ded<br />

is limited in time, <strong>and</strong> its effect on bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis<br />

in adults is inconsistent, it cannot be expected to have a great impact<br />

on the epidemiology of tuberculosis. 858,859<br />

It seems inappropriate to conclude from meta-analyses that BCG provides<br />

some average protection. 791,792 The observed range in protection is<br />

real <strong>and</strong> remains largely unexplained.<br />

In light of the evidence, WHO recommends its use in newborn children<br />

or as early in life as possible. 793,860 This is still sound policy <strong>for</strong> those<br />

countries in the world where tuberculosis is highly prevalent, <strong>and</strong> tuberculous<br />

meningitis is a frequent, disabling or fatal occurrence. It fails to<br />

address the role of BCG where tuberculosis in children has become a rare<br />

occurrence.<br />

The IUATLD has developed recommendations on criteria <strong>for</strong> the discontinuation<br />

of mass BCG vaccination. 861 Three key issues enter into the<br />

decision making process on the discontinuation of BCG vaccination.<br />

The first is the extent of protection BCG actually imparts in a given<br />

location. In the USA, the low efficacy of BCG vaccination in Georgia,<br />

Georgia-Alabama, <strong>and</strong> Puerto Rico had an important impact on the decision<br />

not to routinely utilize BCG vaccination. As such prospective studies<br />

are usually beyond the realm of resource availability, effectiveness<br />

might alternatively be studied utilizing the case-control or contact study<br />

approach.<br />

The second is the frequency of serious <strong>for</strong>ms of tuberculosis in children<br />

(meningitis, disseminated <strong>for</strong>ms) weighted against the frequency of<br />

adverse reactions from the vaccine itself. This has been best studied in<br />

Sweden where the frequency of serious adverse reactions from BCG vaccination<br />

(osteoarticular <strong>and</strong> disseminated mycobacteriosis due to BCG) outweighed<br />

the incidence of cases that the vaccine was intended to prevent<br />

(figure 76). 703 Similarly, BCG vaccination may become non-cost-effective<br />

as the frequency of childhood tuberculosis decreases, so that an increasing<br />

number of children need to be vaccinated to prevent one case.<br />

The third consideration is the value attached to the preservation of the<br />

utility of the interpretation of tuberculin skin test results. BCG vaccination<br />

induces tuberculin sensitivity <strong>and</strong> complicates the interpretation of tuberculin<br />

skin testing results. In industrialized countries with an elimination<br />

strategy in mind, the tuberculin skin test is an important means of identifying<br />

persons with tuberculous infection at a high risk of progression to<br />

tuberculosis who would benefit from preventive chemotherapy.<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!