08.12.2012 Views

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Based on evidence that the addition of pyrazinamide hastened sputum conversion,<br />

a series of studies was designed by the British Medical Research<br />

Council. In 1970, it was demonstrated <strong>for</strong> the first time that the inclusion<br />

of rifampicin <strong>and</strong> pyrazinamide in a regimen of isoniazid <strong>and</strong> streptomycin<br />

substantially reduced the subsequent risk of relapse. 122<br />

A multitude of clinical trials was designed <strong>and</strong> carried out by the<br />

British Medical Research Council with regimens containing, as a minimum,<br />

isoniazid, rifampicin, <strong>and</strong> pyrazinamide in the intensive phase, virtually<br />

always supplemented by streptomycin during this period. 122 Two studies<br />

in East Africa were critical <strong>for</strong> future research into this combination. 507,508<br />

In these trials it was observed that regimens containing pyrazinamide but<br />

not rifampicin were almost as effective as those containing rifampicin.<br />

Furthermore, there was later evidence that both drugs given in the regimen<br />

were more effective than one alone. 122 These studies laid the basis <strong>for</strong><br />

modern treatment.<br />

The consistent finding in these studies was that the four drugs were<br />

optimally given <strong>for</strong> a two-month intensive phase, followed either by four<br />

months of rifampicin plus isoniazid or six months of a combination of drugs<br />

not containing rifampicin (the continuation phase).<br />

The role of the fourth drug (streptomycin or ethambutol) is unclear as<br />

few studies have evaluated it, 491,509 but most likely it has a minor role in<br />

patients with a strain that is fully susceptible at the outset. 122 A recommendation<br />

to drop the fourth drug in patients with sputum smear-negative<br />

tuberculosis seems to have no evidence base. Patients with paucibacillary<br />

disease may require a shorter duration of treatment (see below); however,<br />

dropping the fourth drug in the intensive phase may not be justified as it<br />

may lead to functional monotherapy with rifampicin in lesions with a low<br />

pH among patients with a strain that is initially resistant to isoniazid (pyrazinamide<br />

not being active in such lesions).<br />

Rifampicin-containing continuation phase<br />

A regimen consisting of a two-month intensive phase with isoniazid,<br />

rifampicin, pyrazinamide, <strong>and</strong> streptomycin, followed by a four-month continuation<br />

phase with isoniazid plus rifampicin, all given daily, was first<br />

evaluated in Singapore. 510-512 The high efficacy of this regimen was confirmed<br />

in the United Kingdom, <strong>and</strong> was equally effective if streptomycin<br />

was replaced by ethambutol. 513-515 It has become the st<strong>and</strong>ard regimen <strong>for</strong><br />

patients with fully susceptible organisms in most industrialized countries.<br />

Shorter durations have been put on trial, 516,517 but the frequency of relapse<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!