08.12.2012 Views

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Differences in virulence of M. tuberculosis strains;<br />

• Differences in risk attributable to exogenous reinfection tuberculosis;<br />

• Differences in genetic make-up of vaccinees;<br />

• Differences in nutritional status of vaccinees;<br />

• Differences in prevalence of infection with environmental mycobacteria;<br />

• Other factors.<br />

Differences in methodological stringency<br />

Quite obviously, not every study can be methodologically as rigorously conducted<br />

as ideal st<strong>and</strong>ards of study design <strong>and</strong> conduct call <strong>for</strong>. 731,734 Among<br />

the clinical trials, several have been excluded from major reviews <strong>and</strong> metaanalyses<br />

such as those conducted by Colditz <strong>and</strong> collaborators. 791,792 These<br />

authors found that study validity score explained 66% of the variation in<br />

prospective clinical trials <strong>and</strong> 36% in retrospective case-control studies, 791<br />

<strong>and</strong> only 15% in case-control studies on BCG protection against infant<br />

tuberculosis. 792 Nevertheless, perhaps the most relevant trial showing no<br />

protection against bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis, conducted in<br />

Chingleput, India, was judged to be of high scientific quality by a WHO<br />

expert committee specifically charged to ascertain the trial’s validity. 793<br />

It must be kept in mind that the range of protection cannot be taken<br />

at face value, but must also be seen in the context of what the study in<br />

question sought to address. BCG trials (be they prospective or retrospective)<br />

ascertained protection against various outcomes such as morbid state<br />

(tuberculosis or death from tuberculosis) <strong>and</strong> site of disease, e.g., pulmonary,<br />

extrapulmonary single site, <strong>and</strong> disseminated tuberculosis, taking into account<br />

such things as bacteriologic certainty of the case, age of the patients, <strong>and</strong><br />

time elapsed since vaccination. What seems apparent from the studies is<br />

the tendency of BCG to provide its greatest protection within the few years<br />

following vaccination, against death from tuberculosis, disseminated disease<br />

manifestations, <strong>and</strong> bacteriologically unconfirmed tuberculosis. In summarizing<br />

these effects, BCG is generally most effective against serious <strong>for</strong>ms<br />

of tuberculosis occurring shortly after infection acquired at an early age.<br />

Thus, any evaluation of the protective efficacy of BCG vaccination should<br />

be stratified according to these variables.<br />

116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!