08.12.2012 Views

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

Interventions for Tuberculosis Control and Elimination 2002

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

��� ���<br />

�� �<br />

� ��������� �������<br />

��<br />

�� �<br />

�� �<br />

tuberculosis patients once placed on chemotherapy 29,30,458,459 is largely due<br />

to the use of isoniazid.<br />

Sterilizing activity<br />

�<br />

����<br />

� � � � � �� �� ��<br />

��� �� ���������<br />

Figure 31. Bactericidal activity of isoniazid compared to a four-drug combination<br />

therapy over the first two weeks of treatment. 25<br />

Sterilizing activity is defined as the ability to remove so called “persisters”,<br />

once the large bulk of rapidly growing organisms has been killed. A model<br />

presented by Grosset clarifies these two major components of chemotherapy<br />

(figure 32). 460 Inability to destroy rapidly growing bacilli, located<br />

largely extracellularly, leads to treatment failure, while inability to eradicate<br />

persisters leads to relapse subsequent to treatment completion. Persisters<br />

are bacilli that have a lower metabolic activity <strong>and</strong> thus replicate much<br />

more slowly than bacilli found in cavity linings. It was postulated that the<br />

efficacy of rifampicin as a sterilizing agent was due to its activity on special<br />

populations. 461 This was tested in an experiment reproducing conditions<br />

appropriate <strong>for</strong> high <strong>and</strong> low metabolism of tubercle bacilli, respectively,<br />

using temperature control as the means. 462 At body temperature,<br />

there was only slightly higher activity of rifampicin over isoniazid during<br />

a seven-day period. If pulsed temperature elevation was applied <strong>for</strong> only<br />

one hour per day to increase metabolism, rifampicin was considerably more<br />

active than isoniazid (figure 33). 462<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!