Insight view
CA-10-years-of-independence-insight-view
CA-10-years-of-independence-insight-view
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE COUNTRY: SERVICE TO CITIZENS<br />
USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGIES FOR CIVIC PARTICIPATION<br />
One petition in four years<br />
The Voice of Citizens e-petition is a portal that aims to allow citizens to participate in the creation<br />
of public policies, through filing petitions with the Government of Montenegro electronically. The<br />
project officially started in October 2012, and has been implemented in cooperation with the<br />
United Nations Development Program (UNDP Office in Podgorica). Portal “Voice of a citizen”<br />
(Glas građana) allows all adult Montenegrin citizens who have an identity card, and foreigners<br />
with permanent residence in Montenegro who have identity cards, to file petitions in any area in<br />
the frame of competences of the Government of Montenegro.<br />
During the last 42 months, only two petitions were declared; while 46 were filed, 24 did not manage<br />
to collect the sufficient number of signatures, and 20 petitions were rejected because they<br />
did not fulfill conditions.<br />
A petition that received support required urgent construction and/or upgrading of kindergartens<br />
in Podgorica, Bar, and other municipalities where the problem of limited accommodation capacities<br />
exist. It was voted on at the end of 2012, and was later adopted at a session of the government.<br />
Implementation of the petition is in course. Another petition, “Police Academy in<br />
Danilovgrad to be named after Slavoljub Slavko Šćekić,” was supported at the beginning of 2013,<br />
but was afterwards rejected at a session of the government. The lack of platform is reflected in<br />
the fact that support for these two initiatives were collected offline, or more precisely, by signing<br />
the petition on boulevards of cities, which implies that the platform did not succeed in doing<br />
what it was supposed to – make it easier for citizens to participate.<br />
Citizens<br />
E-participation<br />
Process<br />
Technology<br />
105