Insight view
CA-10-years-of-independence-insight-view
CA-10-years-of-independence-insight-view
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE COUNTRY: PUBLIC GOODS<br />
CARE ABOUT HEALTH OF CITIZENS<br />
The last position among 35<br />
European health systems<br />
Although, according to the Constitution and the Law on Health Care,<br />
every citizen of Montenegro shall be entitled to health care pursuant<br />
to the highest attainable health standards and developments of the<br />
modern medical theory, the situation in reality is, unfortunately, completely<br />
different.<br />
Montenegro holds the last position on the list of 35 European health systems in this year’s Report<br />
of the Euro Health Consumer Index (EHCI). In 2015, our country scored 23 points more as compared<br />
with 2014. However, this was not sufficient to move from the last position on the list. The<br />
report states that Montenegro is a country with the population of only 650,000 inhabitants, implying<br />
that the reforms could be implemented very quickly. EHCI analyzes national health systems<br />
on the basis of 48 indicators that include fields such as rights and information of patients, access<br />
to health care, outcomes of treatment, scope of services, prevention, and use of pharmaceutical<br />
products. Why is this the case? Insufficient dedication of the most responsible persons to the<br />
problems in the health system, insufficient involvement, lack of professional relation of the pivots<br />
of the system and, essentially, their legal and moral (ir)responsibility.<br />
Law in favor of private health institutions<br />
Recently, the newly adopted Law on Networking of Private Health Institutions is the focus of attention.<br />
The law was voted on three years ago with the intention of trying to unburden the Clinical Centre of Montenegro<br />
as a major health institution and to reduce the period of waiting for certain specialist check-ups.<br />
This motive is more than legitimate. However, the law in itself did not regulate a number of other issues,<br />
especially the field relating to the mechanisms of controlling potential abuse. As a result, the majority of<br />
doctors-specialists from the Clinical Centre work in a freelance capacity in many private health institutions.<br />
This indicates that there is a space for a huge conflict of interest, so “fictional” patients waiting lists were<br />
created very quickly. According to the data of the non-governmental organization “Krug života”(“Circle of<br />
Life”), which deals with the protection of patients’ rights, a negative trend has been noticed in terms of<br />
the financing of certain specialist departments within state-owned institutions, which directly affects their<br />
work and leads to their silent closure.<br />
79