22.11.2016 Views

(Part 1)

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JBTM Book Reviews<br />

151<br />

Due to the purposes and focuses as stated above, some areas of the book could be<br />

improved. First, many of the basic interpretive assumptions of the authors are logically weak.<br />

It would be easy to accept the idea of a pretribulation rapture if Jesus had taught the rapture<br />

clearly. However, not all of the eschatological Gospel references indicate clearly the existence<br />

of a pretribulation rapture. The assumption that Paul would have gained his information on<br />

this subject directly from Jesus and not from his own spiritually-guided reading of the Old<br />

Testament prophets is an over-simplified view of Paul’s scholarship and a weak attempt at<br />

providing more authority to the pretribulationists cause by claiming that their ideas come<br />

directly from Jesus. In addition, the creative exegesis needed to reveal Paul’s understanding<br />

of a pretribulation rapture pushes the boundaries of sound biblical analysis. Second, the<br />

redefinition of terms such as apostasy as well as forcing concepts to fit a preconceived<br />

interpretive philosophy moves away from a natural reading of these eschatological passages.<br />

Ultimately, this leaves the reader with a sense that these authors are trying a bit too hard to<br />

prove their point beyond all doubt.<br />

Even with those concerns, Evidence for the Rapture will be a treasured resource for the<br />

reader who is convinced of a pretribulation rapture. The wealth of information and the<br />

biblical focus will delight readers who share a similar view of the rapture. However, for<br />

readers who are not inclined to accept the biblical maneuverings of pretribulationism, this<br />

book will be an exercise in patience as one pursues a better understanding of the arguments<br />

from pretribulationist interpreters.<br />

- Randolph Rogers, Wayland Baptist University, Plainview, Texas<br />

Fortress Commentary on the Bible: The New Testament. Edited by Margaret Aymer,<br />

Cynthia Briggs Kittredge, and David A. Sánchez. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2014. 700 pages.<br />

Hardcover, $39.00.<br />

The editors of the Fortress Commentary on the Bible affirm that biblical interpretation is a<br />

responsibility that surpasses the boundaries of any particular religious community. Therefore,<br />

this two-volume set is intended to serve as a resource for general readers of diverse social and<br />

ideological locations. Throughout the commentary a survey of historical and contemporary<br />

interpretations of biblical texts is provided in order to encourage “competent and discerning<br />

interpretation of the Bible’s themes today” (2). The current review will focus exclusively on<br />

the New Testament volume of the set.<br />

The structure of the commentary is conducive to its emphasis on past and present<br />

engagement with the biblical text. The compilation begins with four topical essays that<br />

deal with contemporary interpretive perspectives, the Jewish heritage of Christianity, the<br />

experience of rootlessness in the early Christian community, and the apocalyptic legacy of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!