(Part 1)
JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016
JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
JBTM Book Reviews<br />
151<br />
Due to the purposes and focuses as stated above, some areas of the book could be<br />
improved. First, many of the basic interpretive assumptions of the authors are logically weak.<br />
It would be easy to accept the idea of a pretribulation rapture if Jesus had taught the rapture<br />
clearly. However, not all of the eschatological Gospel references indicate clearly the existence<br />
of a pretribulation rapture. The assumption that Paul would have gained his information on<br />
this subject directly from Jesus and not from his own spiritually-guided reading of the Old<br />
Testament prophets is an over-simplified view of Paul’s scholarship and a weak attempt at<br />
providing more authority to the pretribulationists cause by claiming that their ideas come<br />
directly from Jesus. In addition, the creative exegesis needed to reveal Paul’s understanding<br />
of a pretribulation rapture pushes the boundaries of sound biblical analysis. Second, the<br />
redefinition of terms such as apostasy as well as forcing concepts to fit a preconceived<br />
interpretive philosophy moves away from a natural reading of these eschatological passages.<br />
Ultimately, this leaves the reader with a sense that these authors are trying a bit too hard to<br />
prove their point beyond all doubt.<br />
Even with those concerns, Evidence for the Rapture will be a treasured resource for the<br />
reader who is convinced of a pretribulation rapture. The wealth of information and the<br />
biblical focus will delight readers who share a similar view of the rapture. However, for<br />
readers who are not inclined to accept the biblical maneuverings of pretribulationism, this<br />
book will be an exercise in patience as one pursues a better understanding of the arguments<br />
from pretribulationist interpreters.<br />
- Randolph Rogers, Wayland Baptist University, Plainview, Texas<br />
Fortress Commentary on the Bible: The New Testament. Edited by Margaret Aymer,<br />
Cynthia Briggs Kittredge, and David A. Sánchez. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2014. 700 pages.<br />
Hardcover, $39.00.<br />
The editors of the Fortress Commentary on the Bible affirm that biblical interpretation is a<br />
responsibility that surpasses the boundaries of any particular religious community. Therefore,<br />
this two-volume set is intended to serve as a resource for general readers of diverse social and<br />
ideological locations. Throughout the commentary a survey of historical and contemporary<br />
interpretations of biblical texts is provided in order to encourage “competent and discerning<br />
interpretation of the Bible’s themes today” (2). The current review will focus exclusively on<br />
the New Testament volume of the set.<br />
The structure of the commentary is conducive to its emphasis on past and present<br />
engagement with the biblical text. The compilation begins with four topical essays that<br />
deal with contemporary interpretive perspectives, the Jewish heritage of Christianity, the<br />
experience of rootlessness in the early Christian community, and the apocalyptic legacy of