22.11.2016 Views

(Part 1)

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JBTM Book Reviews<br />

154<br />

“The People of God and the Peoples of the Earth” and “Reading the Christian Old Testament<br />

in the Contemporary World,” explore issues such as ethnography, ecology, and sociology in<br />

relation to biblical studies. The contributors discuss the clash of worldviews that modern<br />

interpreters often experience when approaching the ancient texts, and shine light on new<br />

interpretive avenues, such as feminist and post-colonial readings.<br />

The main body of the commentary is divided into five sections: Torah, Historical Writings,<br />

Wisdom and Worship, Prophets, and Apocrypha. Each section begins with an essay providing<br />

introductory material on genre, authorship, historical setting(s), and distinctive themes.<br />

The preliminary essays are followed by a chapter devoted to each biblical book within their<br />

respective categories. The commentary chapters provide a section-by-section analysis of the<br />

biblical text with corresponding discussions of “The Text in Its Ancient Context” and “The<br />

Text in the Interpretive Tradition.” Each chapter concludes with bibliographical information.<br />

The greatest strengths of the book are threefold. First, the attention given to the history<br />

of interpretation, past and present, for each biblical pericope is invaluable. There are few<br />

other resources that provide such a comprehensive survey of the history of interpretation for<br />

the entire Old Testament and Apocrypha. Second, all of the contributors give consideration<br />

to the historical and literary backgrounds of the biblical texts. Attention is given, for instance,<br />

to the writings of Philo, Josephus, Qumran, and many others. Additionally, readers are<br />

introduced to patristic writings through the interpretive histories. Third, unlike most Old<br />

Testament commentaries, the volume contains a substantive section on apocryphal works.<br />

The contributors provide an excellent overview of the body of literature as a whole, as well<br />

as information on specific apocryphal texts. Regardless of whether one regards the literature<br />

as canonical, the thorough treatment certainly will enhance readers’ understanding of both<br />

Old and New Testament contexts.<br />

On a critical note, evangelical readers will encounter several major problems with the<br />

volume. First, the commentary boasts an impressive array of expert contributors from<br />

a variety of ecumenical viewpoints. Unfortunately, evangelical conservatives are sorely<br />

underrepresented. As a result, many of the contributors do not appear to regard the Bible as<br />

the inspired Word of God. For example, Hugh R. Page Jr. blatantly asserts that “the Hebrew<br />

Bible does not speak with a single voice on the issues of what it means to be part of the<br />

human family” (40). Matthew J. M. Coomber suggests that the portrayal of God in the Torah<br />

is an amalgamation of the Canaanite God El and the Israelite YHWH (18–19). Rodney S.<br />

Sadler Jr., in his exegesis of Genesis, posits that the puzzling narrative of Noah’s sin Gen<br />

9:18–28 is included as an inadequate “justification for the dislocation and oppression of the<br />

Canaanites” (101). Moreover, the inclusion of Tamar Kamionkowski’s textually unjustifiable<br />

interpretation of the Nadab and Abihu incident (Lev 10–11) as a “homoerotic account”<br />

reflects a troubling disregard for proper exegesis. With so many instances of doubt regarding<br />

the authority and inspiration of the Bible in the opening chapters alone, evangelicals may be<br />

hesitant to utilize the volume as a resource.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!