22.11.2016 Views

(Part 1)

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JBTM Book Reviews<br />

156<br />

Lord’s Supper structure the church” (3).<br />

Going Public is divided into the following three parts: Getting Our Bearings; Building a<br />

Case; and The Case Stated, Defended, Applied. In <strong>Part</strong> 1, Jamieson provides an introduction<br />

in which he explains why baptism as a requirement for membership is a topic worth debating.<br />

After providing some foundational definitions regarding membership and communion,<br />

Jamieson then describes two key issues surrounding the baptism-membership debate: 1)<br />

“the question of whether baptism is the initiatory rite into the church and how that bears<br />

on its relationship to church membership,” and 2) “the theological relationship—or better,<br />

interrelationship—between baptism, the Lord’s Supper, and church membership” (16–17).<br />

In chapter 2, Jamieson offers six reasons why “open membership just feels right” (21).<br />

These include: the culture of tolerance, a pendulum swing on discipline and denominational<br />

divisions, evangelicals’ cooperative DNA, evangelical essentialism (i.e., boiling doctrine<br />

down to the essentials of salvation), advancing secularism and the need to stick together,<br />

and not wanting to be the odd man out (22–32).<br />

In <strong>Part</strong> 2, Jamieson builds his case for the ecclesial shape of baptism and communion—<br />

their “intrinsic connection to local church membership” (56). He first offers a theology of<br />

baptism, arguing that “baptism is where faith goes public” (36). After providing a biblicaltheological<br />

understanding of baptism, Jamieson argues that the biblical evidence suggests<br />

that all Christians should be baptized, and because baptism is where faith goes public,<br />

paedobaptism is not biblical baptism. In the next two chapters, Jamieson suggests that<br />

baptism should be understood in two ways. First, baptism should be understood as the<br />

initiating oath-sign of the new covenant. In describing baptism as the initiating oath-sign of<br />

the new covenant, Jamieson is saying that “baptism is a solemn, symbolic vow which ratifies<br />

a person’s entrance into the new covenant” (63). Second, Jamieson considers baptism to be<br />

the passport of the kingdom, meaning baptism is “how the church identifies someone as a<br />

kingdom citizen” (93). He writes, “When a church baptizes someone, they identify him or her<br />

as a member of the new covenant, a citizen of the kingdom, someone who belongs to God<br />

and God’s people” (93).<br />

In the next chapter, Jamieson connects baptism with communion and church membership.<br />

Jamieson notes, “The Lord’s Supper, therefore, is an exercise of the church’s authority<br />

to affirm and oversee its members’ professions of faith in Jesus” (118–19). This leads him to<br />

conclude several points, including that baptism should be a requirement to participate in<br />

communion and that the Lord’s Supper is an effective sign of membership (125–26). Because<br />

baptism and communion provide the church with ecclesial shape, “they give the church visible,<br />

institutional form and order” (144). Ultimately, to remove baptism as a requirement for<br />

membership obviates membership altogether.<br />

In <strong>Part</strong> 3, Jamieson puts together the pieces he discussed in <strong>Part</strong> 2 together. First, he<br />

provides a thorough summary of why baptism is required for membership. Then, he answers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!