22.11.2016 Views

(Part 1)

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JBTM Jeffrey G. Audirsch<br />

55<br />

ancient Israel’s interaction with God and the surrounding nations. It includes<br />

multiple theologies from various traditions and it describes elements of<br />

worship that are foreign to modern readers. Thus, it is imperative that the<br />

interpreter/preacher be fluent in the major themes, theological motifs, and<br />

historical events of ancient Israel.<br />

5. Identify the historical background/context. Every biblical text has a context.<br />

The task of the interpreter/preacher is to identify—through various means<br />

sometimes—the most probable context of a given passage. In some cases,<br />

identifying the historical background/context of a poem is easy (e.g., the<br />

Song of Hannah in 1 Sam 2:1–1). At other times, especially in the Psalter,<br />

the historical background/context is not easily identifiable. When dealing<br />

with the Psalter, this principle should include more practical questions:<br />

What type of psalm is it? What is the purpose of the psalm (particularly<br />

with regard to its type)? Who is speaking? Is the psalm evoking a response<br />

from an individual, a group, or both? In these cases, the interpreter/preacher<br />

should rely on various introductory books and commentaries to assist in the<br />

process. Additionally, it will be greatly beneficial if interpreters/preachers<br />

are familiar with both Noth’s and Westermann’s approaches to classification<br />

of the psalms (see above).<br />

From a preaching point of view, interpreters/preachers can preach a poetic<br />

text from two perspectives. Either focus on the meaning of the poetic text<br />

or focus should be on what is behind the poetic text. Both approaches are<br />

valuable. Naturally, a blend of the two can be done as well. The difference<br />

between the two approaches is significant. The focus on the meaning of the<br />

text approach is more concerned with the emotive purpose of the song/hymn<br />

over and against the back story (i.e., historical background/context) of the<br />

other approach. In short, focus on the meaning of the poetic text approach<br />

tries to avoid preaching the back story of a poem/psalm by focusing mainly<br />

on “the meaning of the text.” 92 For example, most scholars agree that the<br />

historical background/context of Ps 51 is David’s affair with Bathsheba and<br />

the subsequent condemnation of the king by the prophet Nathan (2 Sam<br />

11–12). Thus, preaching from the meaning of the poetic text rather than the<br />

what is behind the text would mean that the interpreter/preaching would not<br />

focus on David’s moral failure described in the Samuel corpus, but rather on<br />

the emotive response of David to his sins.<br />

6. Identify the figurative and cultural-specific language. One of the greatest<br />

difficulties in preaching biblical poetry is trying to interpret and understand<br />

92<br />

Steven Smith, Recapturing the Voice of God (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 2015), 135–36.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!