Ten-Year Impacts of Burkina Faso’s BRIGHT Program

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CONTENTS MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH F. Subgroup impacts .................................................................................................................... 43 1. Impacts by age .................................................................................................................. 43 2. Impacts by gender............................................................................................................. 47 G. Reasons for non-enrollment .................................................................................................... 48 V COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS ....................................................... 51 A. Data for cost analysis and assumptions .................................................................................. 53 B. Cost-effectiveness of the BRIGHT program ............................................................................ 56 C. Benefit-cost analysis for the BRIGHT program ....................................................................... 59 VI SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION ............................................................................ 67 A. Differences in school characteristics ....................................................................................... 68 B. Impacts of the BRIGHT program ............................................................................................. 68 C. Cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of BRIGHT...................................................................... 70 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................ 73 APPENDIX A: STATISTICAL MODEL FOR IMPACT ESTIMATION .................................................... A.1 APPENDIX B: VALIDATION OF REGRESSION DISCONTINUITY DESIGN ....................................... B.1 APPENDIX C: APPENDIX D: ROBUSTNESS OF IMPACT ESTIMATES ....................................................................C.1 DETAILS ON COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS ....................................................................D.1 APPENDIX E: SURVEY INSTRUMENTS .............................................................................................. E.1 APPENDIX F: STAKEHOLDER STATEMENTS OF DIFFERENCE OR SUPPORT ............................ F.1 vi
TABLES ES.1 ES.2 ES.3 ES.4 ES.5 ES.6 Ten-year impacts of the BRIGHT program on enrollment and test scores ................................... xvii Ten-year impacts of the BRIGHT program on child labor activities ............................................. xviii Ten-year impacts of the BRIGHT program on young adult outcomes ......................................... xviii Differential ten-year impacts of the BRIGHT program on girls compared to boys......................... xix Cost-effectiveness estimates of the BRIGHT program ................................................................... xx Benefit-cost estimates of the BRIGHT program ........................................................................... xxii I.1 Evolution of completion of primary education: Burkina Faso, 1971–2014 ....................................... 2 I.2 Short-term impacts of BRIGHT on enrollment and test scores ........................................................ 5 I.3 Seven-year impacts of the BRIGHT program on enrollment and test scores ................................ 10 II.1 Summary of village and household characteristics ........................................................................ 27 IV.1 Estimated differences in school characteristics between villages selected and not selected for the BRIGHT program ................................................................................................. 34 IV.2 Ten-year impacts of BRIGHT on self-reported enrollment ............................................................ 37 IV.3 Ten-year impacts of the BRIGHT program on test scores ............................................................. 39 IV.4 Ten-year impacts of BRIGHT on children’s labor activities ........................................................... 41 IV.5 Ten-year impacts of the BRIGHT program on young adult outcomes ........................................... 43 IV.6 Estimated differences in enrolled student characteristics between villages selected and not selected for BRIGHT ................................................................................................................ 47 IV.7 Ten-year impacts of BRIGHT on girls compared to boys .............................................................. 48 IV.8 Probability that the indicated reason is provided as a reason for not enrolling child in school ............................................................................................................................................. 49 V.1 Differences between effectiveness and benefit-cost estimates ..................................................... 53 V.2 Cost of the BRIGHT schools .......................................................................................................... 55 V.3 Cost of traditional government schools .......................................................................................... 56 V.4 List of assumptions for cost-effectiveness analysis ....................................................................... 57 V.5 Cost-effectiveness estimates of the BRIGHT II program ............................................................... 58 V.6 List of assumptions for benefit-cost ratio and ERR calculation ..................................................... 60 V.7 Benefits of an additional year of exposure to BRIGHT for illustrative cohorts ............................... 63 V.8 Benefit-cost estimates of the BRIGHT program per village ........................................................... 64 VI.1 ERR estimates of the BRIGHT program ........................................................................................ 71 vii
Page 1 and 2: Ten-Year Impacts of Burkina Faso’
Page 3 and 4: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report is the
Page 5: CONTENTS ACRONYMS .................
Page 9 and 10: FIGURES I.1 Gross enrollment ratios
Page 11 and 12: ACRONYMS AMEs - Association de Mèr
Page 13 and 14: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The BRIGHT progra
Page 15 and 16: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MATHEMATICA POLIC
Page 23 and 24: I. INTRODUCTION From 2005 through 2
Page 25 and 26: I. INTRODUCTION MATHEMATICA POLICY
Page 31 and 32: I: INTRODUCTION MATHEMATICA POLICY
Page 39 and 40: II. EVALUATION DESIGN AND DATA COLL
Page 51 and 52: III. IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY Under t
Page 53 and 54: III. IMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY MATHEMA
Page 55 and 56: IV. FINDINGS In this chapter, we pr
Page 57 and 58:
IV: FINDINGS MATHEMATICA POLICY RES
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
V. COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND COST-BENE
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
VI. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND DISCUSS
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
REFERENCES Abeberese, Ama Baafra, T
Page 97 and 98:
REFERENCES MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEA
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
APPENDIX A STATISTICAL MODEL FOR IM
Page 105 and 106:
APPENDIX A MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEA
Page 107 and 108:
APPENDIX B VALIDATION OF REGRESSION
Page 109 and 110:
APPENDIX B MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEA
Page 111 and 112:
APPENDIX B MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEA
Page 113 and 114:
APPENDIX C ROBUSTNESS OF IMPACT EST
Page 115 and 116:
APPENDIX C MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEA
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
APPENDIX D DETAILS ON COST-BENEFIT
Page 127 and 128:
APPENDIX D MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEA
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
APPENDIX E SURVEY FORMS
Page 151 and 152:
APPENDIX E MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEA
Page 153 and 154:
APPENDIX E BURKINA FASO MATHEMATICA
Page 155 and 156:
APPENDIX E MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEA
Page 157 and 158:
HOUSEHOLD LISTING FORM Village ID:
Page 159 and 160:
ENROLLMENT MODULE VILLAGE ID: ___ _
Page 161 and 162:
CHILD LABOR MODULE VILLAGE ID: ___
Page 163 and 164:
YOUNG ADULT MODULE VILLAGE ID: ___
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
ASSESSMENT CONSENT LANGUAGE: PLEASE
Page 171 and 172:
MATH ASSESSMENT VILLAGE ID: ___ ___
Page 173 and 174:
MATH ASSESSMENT VILLAGE ID: ___ ___
Page 175 and 176:
FRENCH ASSESSMENT VILLAGE ID: ___ _
Page 177 and 178:
FRENCH ASSESSMENT VILLAGE ID: ___ _
Page 179 and 180:
BURKINA FASO SCHOOL INFORMATION PAN
Page 181 and 182:
A: SCHOOL CHARACTERISTICS SC SC9. D
Page 183 and 184:
C: SCHOOL PHYSICAL STRUCTURE SS SS5
Page 185 and 186:
This page has been left blank for d
Page 187 and 188:
This page has been left blank for d
Page 189 and 190:
APPENDIX F MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEA
show all

Ten-Year Impacts of Burkina Faso’s BRIGHT Program

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?