19.12.2016 Views

Ten-Year Impacts of Burkina Faso’s BRIGHT Program

n?u=RePEc:mpr:mprres:2ecdd42bb503422b802ce20da2bf64b7&r=edu

n?u=RePEc:mpr:mprres:2ecdd42bb503422b802ce20da2bf64b7&r=edu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

V. COST-EFFECTIVENESS AND COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH<br />

40-year period; we assess the benefits <strong>of</strong> exposure during this same period on the benefits<br />

side. 46<br />

2. To simplify the calculations, we assume that the fixed costs for all schools, <strong>BRIGHT</strong> and<br />

traditional government, are incurred at the start <strong>of</strong> the schools’ life span in 2006. Although<br />

this is true for all <strong>BRIGHT</strong> schools, it is not true for traditional government schools.<br />

Table V.6. List <strong>of</strong> assumptions for benefit-cost ratio and ERR calculation<br />

Variable<br />

Basis<br />

Assumed<br />

value<br />

Life span <strong>of</strong> school<br />

<strong>BRIGHT</strong> school <strong>Program</strong> design from MCC 40<br />

Traditional government schools Assumed due to lower quality relative to the <strong>BRIGHT</strong><br />

schools 30<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> participation in school 2015 follow-up household survey 6–12<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> participation in labor force <strong>Burkina</strong> Faso Household Survey, 2010 a 15–65<br />

Average grade level in unselected<br />

villages<br />

Grades gained per year <strong>of</strong> exposure<br />

Estimates from 2015 follow-up household and school<br />

surveys 1.56<br />

Estimates from 2015 follow-up household and school<br />

surveys 0.10<br />

Average cohort size Estimation from 2015 evaluation survey census b 17<br />

Benefits derive only from higher wages<br />

Research does not exist to allow monetization <strong>of</strong> other<br />

benefits<br />

Annual earnings <strong>of</strong> working population Estimates from <strong>Burkina</strong> Faso Household Survey, 2010 c $643<br />

Return to extra grade level Estimates from <strong>Burkina</strong> Faso Household Surveys, 1994,<br />

1998, 2003, and 2010 d<br />

High estimate 16%<br />

Low estimate 7%<br />

Discount rate MCC practice for net present value calculation e 10%<br />

Notes:<br />

a<br />

We examined the distribution <strong>of</strong> the working population by age using data from the 2010 National Household Survey<br />

to determine that the typical working age in <strong>Burkina</strong> Faso is between 15 and 70. However, the life expectancy <strong>of</strong> a 6-<br />

year-old is 65 (United Nations 2013).<br />

b<br />

To estimate the cohort size, we take the average <strong>of</strong> all the age cohorts from 6 years to 22 years in the census<br />

carried out as part <strong>of</strong> the 2015 follow-up household survey.<br />

c<br />

Calculated as the average annual earnings <strong>of</strong> the working-age population ages 15–65 from the 2014 <strong>Burkina</strong> Faso<br />

National Household Survey. Note that unemployed individuals are included and considered to have no earnings.<br />

d<br />

Estimated using data from the 1994, 1998, 2003, 2010, and 2014 <strong>Burkina</strong> Faso Household Surveys. This analysis is<br />

presented in Appendix Table D.10.<br />

e<br />

See MCC 2013.<br />

N/A<br />

46<br />

We assume 40 years because this is the estimated life span specified by the program. However, it is possible that<br />

this goal might not be achieved. For example, it is possible that the <strong>Burkina</strong>be government might choose to use the<br />

schools past their recommended lifetime or that the schools might not be maintained sufficiently, resulting in a<br />

shorter-than-expected life span. However, the assumed life span does not significantly affect the final cost-benefit<br />

estimates. We conducted two additional estimates assuming that the <strong>BRIGHT</strong> schools lasted 30 or 50 years and<br />

government schools lasted 10 years less than the <strong>BRIGHT</strong> schools. The resulting ERR estimates are almost identical<br />

to those presented in Table V.8. The net benefits and benefits-cost ratios are also similar, with the shorter life spans<br />

generating larger benefits because the 10-year period in which the government school is closed is less heavily<br />

discounted. For example, the net benefits <strong>of</strong> the high returns to schooling, high government school cost scenario is -<br />

$34,413 per village with a 30-year <strong>BRIGHT</strong> life span and -$87,342 with a 50-year life span.<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!