09.12.2012 Views

NAMS 2002 Workshop - ICOM 2008

NAMS 2002 Workshop - ICOM 2008

NAMS 2002 Workshop - ICOM 2008

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Drinking and Wastewater Applications III – 2<br />

Wednesday July 16, 10:15 AM-10:45 AM, Maui<br />

Coagulation-Ceramic Microfiltration Hybrid System Effectively Removes<br />

Virus that is Difficult to Remove in Conventional Coagulation-<br />

Sedimentation-Sand Filtration Process<br />

N. Shirasaki, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan<br />

T. Matsushita (Speaker), Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan - taku-m@eng.hokudai.ac.jp<br />

Y. Matsui, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan<br />

M. Kobuke, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan<br />

T. Urasaki, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan<br />

K. Ohno, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan<br />

INTRODUCTION Ceramic membranes have attracted attention in the field of<br />

drinking water treatment in Japan. However, in general, ceramic membranes are<br />

microfiltration (MF) devices, so their pore sizes are not small enough to exclude<br />

particles with diameters less than tens of nanometers. Included among such<br />

small particles are some of the pathogenic waterborne viruses. These viruses<br />

cannot be excluded by ceramic membranes alone. To compensate for this<br />

disadvantage, it was proposed that coagulation, which is usually employed to<br />

destabilize and aggregate small particles and then to remove them under gravity,<br />

be used in combination with ceramic MF. Our group has already reported the<br />

usefulness of the coagulation- ceramic MF hybrid system for virus removal.<br />

However, evaluation of treatment processes in terms of virus removal is<br />

generally based on virus concentration quantified by plaque forming unit (PFU)<br />

method; our previous report also evaluated the hybrid system by the method.<br />

Judging from its measurement principle, the PFU method detects infectious virus<br />

alone, but does not detect inactivated one. Therefore, quantification of virus in<br />

the MF permeate by the PFU method might underestimate the potential risk of<br />

virus, because a part of the virus is inactivated during the treatment process. If<br />

the temporarily inactivated virus recovers its infectivity after the process, it might<br />

pollute our drinking water. In this meaning, investigating removal of virus<br />

including inactivated one as well as infectious one is very important for the<br />

evaluation of treatment processes. Accordingly, the objectives of the present<br />

study are to investigate the removal of virus regardless of its infectivity by using<br />

polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, and to compare the removals during<br />

the coagulation-ceramic MF hybrid system and the conventional coagulationsedimentation-sand<br />

filtration process for confirming superiority of the hybrid MF<br />

system in virus removal.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS (1) Virus used Bacteriophage MS2, whose<br />

diameter is 23 nm, was used as a model virus. Virus was quantified by both the<br />

PFU and PCR methods. The PFU method quantifies infectious virus, while the<br />

PCR method quantifies total virus particles regardless of their infectivity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!