09.12.2012 Views

NAMS 2002 Workshop - ICOM 2008

NAMS 2002 Workshop - ICOM 2008

NAMS 2002 Workshop - ICOM 2008

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ehaviour was investigated in a 10 L external MBR (microfiltration), at constant<br />

operating conditions. Initial permeability was fixed at 265 L.h -1 .m -2 .bar -1 , with a<br />

relative standard deviation of 8%. A mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS)<br />

concentration of 10 g.L -1 was chosen. When MLSS was increased from 8 g.L -1 to<br />

16 g.L -1 , at a transmembrane pressure (TMP) of 2.5 bar and a crossflow velocity<br />

of 3 m.s -1 , there was a 20% decrease in permeate flux. Critical flux, defined as<br />

the minimum flux that creates an irreversible deposit on the membrane [1], is the<br />

key parameter used to predict fouling. However, MBRs are typically operated at<br />

fluxes above the critical flux of the system. At 4 m.s -1 crossflow velocity, critical<br />

flux appeared between 0.7 and 0.9 bar, with a permeate flux of 70-85 L.h -1 .m -2 .<br />

Critical flux also depends on the membrane state. At 5 m.s -1 , a new membrane<br />

had an irreversible fouling between 0.7 and 0.9 bar whereas a previously fouled<br />

membrane had a critical flux below 0.7 bar. One method for reducing membrane<br />

fouling consists of increasing the crossflow velocity. At a fixed TMP of 2.5 bar,<br />

when crossflow velocities were increased from 2 to 5 m.s -1 , the permeate flux<br />

increased from 142%. Backpulses can also be used to reduce membrane fouling.<br />

For one-day experiments, with 2 and 4 m.s -1 crossflow velocities and 1 bar TMP,<br />

1 s backpulses per minute did not improve flux permeate. A four-day experiment<br />

at 5 m.s -1 and 1 bar gave the same result. Therefore, backpulses can influence<br />

filtration but not during short term experiments. Previous research [2] has<br />

indicated extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) as the most significant factor<br />

affecting fouling in MBRs. EPS effects on fouling mechanisms occurring in the<br />

external MBR are currently being investigated. First, experiments without the<br />

membrane will show the effect of the pump shear stress on the EPS<br />

concentration. The same type of experiments, performed with the membrane, will<br />

show the effect of the membrane on the EPS concentration.<br />

[1] Espinasse B, Bacchin P and Aimar P. On an experimental method to measure critical flux in<br />

ultrafiltration. Desalination; <strong>2002</strong>, 146:91-96.<br />

[2] Le-Clech P, Chen V and Fane TAG. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater<br />

treatment. Journal of Membrane Science; 2006, 284:17-53.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!