09.12.2012 Views

NAMS 2002 Workshop - ICOM 2008

NAMS 2002 Workshop - ICOM 2008

NAMS 2002 Workshop - ICOM 2008

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Membrane Fouling - General Topics – 5<br />

Monday July 14, 11:45 AM-12:15 PM, O’ahu<br />

Scale-up of Lab Investigations on Fouling in MBR Potentials and<br />

Limitations<br />

M. Kraume (Speaker), Technische Universität Berlin, Chair of Chemical Engineering, Germany,<br />

matthias.kraume@tu-berlin.de<br />

D. Wedi, Engineering Office ATM<br />

T. de la Torre, Berlin Centre of Competence for Water<br />

J. Schaller, Technische Universität Berlin, Chair of Chemical Engineering, Germany<br />

V. Iversen, Technische Universität Berlin, Chair of Chemical Engineering, Germany<br />

A. Drews, Technische Universität Berlin, Chair of Chemical Engineering, Germany<br />

Objective Despite the large number of publications, membrane fouling still is not<br />

well understood due to the complexity of the interacting phenomena and the<br />

multitude of module and reactor configurations as well as wastewaters and<br />

operating conditions. To reduce the number of influencing factors, often lab trials<br />

are carried out where only the parameter of interest is to be varied. These are<br />

either filtration experiments (e.g., filtration mechanisms, fouling rate) carried out<br />

with real or model feeds, biological investigations (e.g., soluble microbial<br />

products (SMP) occurrence), a combination of both (e.g., fouling propensity of<br />

SMP formed under different conditions) or concern suited cleaning protocols.<br />

However, the outcomes of such studies are frequently inconsistent or even<br />

contradictory. The representativeness of conclusions drawn from such trials is<br />

thus highly questionable - both quantitatively and qualitatively. In the light of such<br />

contradictions, this paper aims at answering the question how representative of<br />

full scale operation lab trials are or indeed can be, i.e., what can be expected<br />

from them at all considering their inherent differences from technical operating<br />

conditions. Summarizing the different experiences, guidelines for a ‘good<br />

laboratory practice’ will be derived concerning appropriate experimental set-ups<br />

and corresponding test protocols.<br />

Results<br />

Initially, types of experiments and distinct differences are analyzed. In the<br />

second part, results from own experiences in lab (1-140 L), pilot (1.5 m³) and full<br />

scale (250-9,200 p.e.) together with data from literature are exemplarily<br />

discussed to highlight potentials and limitations of different experimental<br />

approaches. In general, lab scale experiments are an indispensable tool for<br />

fundamental fouling research. With regards to their value and applicability to full<br />

scale it will be stated that: · Properly done short-term experiments based on<br />

suited protocols can be used to characterize the filterability and the relative<br />

fouling propensity of different sludges. The absolute values of measured fouling<br />

rates, however, are never appropriate to describe long-term operation in full

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!