Towards a Better Future
A Review of the Irish School System John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
A Review of the Irish School System
John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Towards</strong> a <strong>Better</strong> <strong>Future</strong>: A Review of the Irish School System<br />
influence in the re-shaping of the school system in recent years. Leadership and staffing of the<br />
Inspectorate also underwent significant change, with a new recruiting policy shaped by its<br />
professional concerns (Coolahan, 2009, pp. 260-290). Among key internal structures were the Senior<br />
Management Group (SMG), the Evaluation Support and Research Unit (ESRU) and the Staff<br />
Development Unit (SDU). Improved inspector induction processes were introduced and more<br />
extensive forms of continuing professional development (CPD) were made available, reflective of the<br />
Chief Inspector’s comment of the Inspectorate as ‘a learning organisation’.<br />
Among key early indicators of the changing<br />
pattern of work and communication of the<br />
Inspectorate in the early years of this century<br />
were the following: In 1999, the School<br />
Development Planning Unit was set up, which<br />
in subsequent years, would guide schools in<br />
implementing the school development planning<br />
policy. In 2002, the Inspectorate published its<br />
Professional Code of Practice on Evaluating and<br />
Reporting, making known to interested parties<br />
how it approached its work. In 2002, it also<br />
published Fifty Reports: What Inspectors Say, to<br />
inform on the viewpoints of the Inspectorate on<br />
“<br />
The changed role of the<br />
Inspectorate coincided with a<br />
major reform of the then<br />
Department of Education and<br />
Science (DES), following the<br />
Deloitte & Touche, 1999, and the<br />
Cromien, 2000, reports.<br />
”<br />
practice evaluated. A publication to help schools in self-evaluation, Looking at Our Schools, was<br />
published in 2003.<br />
The first new form of inspection, Whole-School Evaluation (WSE), took place in primary schools<br />
in 2003 and in post-primary schools in 2004. The first Chief Inspector’s Report, for 2001-04, was<br />
published in 2005 (DES, 2005c). In 2006, a notable event took place with the first Inspectors’<br />
Reports on the evaluation of schools published on the DES website. The Chief Inspector’s Report for<br />
2008 is a good example of the changed culture of inspection that had been brought about in these<br />
years. It provides an overview of the range and scale of the various forms of inspection then operative<br />
and includes focussed comments on the strengths and weaknesses of aspects of the school system. It<br />
clearly emphasises the close engagement now operating by the Inspectorate with the work of<br />
teachers, school communities, and provision outside the mainstream system (DES, 2009). It provides<br />
incisive comment on what is working well in schools, what needs to be improved, and what needs<br />
to be done into the future. Overall, the Report is reflective of a significant shift in direction for much<br />
of the work of the Inspectorate in which evaluation and mentoring of educational quality, on the<br />
ground, is centre stage, extensive feedback is given to practitioners, policy advice is collated, and<br />
reflection occurs on emerging trends. It is also significant to note that, between 2002 and 2008, the<br />
— 138 —