Towards a Better Future
A Review of the Irish School System John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
A Review of the Irish School System
John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Towards</strong> a <strong>Better</strong> <strong>Future</strong>: A Review of the Irish School System<br />
purposes that are educationally promising as practical forms of action; purposes, moreover, that<br />
seek to be socially defensible in a universal sense. Among such purposes that can initially be<br />
identified are the following three:<br />
■ uncovering constructive potentials that are native to each individual<br />
■ cultivating such potentials through renewed imaginative engagements with inheritances of<br />
learning and seeking to broaden the range in each case<br />
■ promoting practices of learning that acknowledge and respect differences, and that dispose<br />
learners to seek to benefit others as well as themselves.<br />
To put the matter like this is to say that a learning environment that is truly educational is marked<br />
less by adherence to a particular party, church or group, or indeed to any version of the question<br />
‘what knowledge is of most worth?’ A truly educational learning environment is oriented primarily<br />
to the needs of the students. It seeks to open up a range of study possibilities that answer promisingly<br />
to these needs, while promoting co-operative learning practices and ensuring that competitive<br />
impulses remain healthy. It is marked firstly by a commitment to building and sustaining a vibrant<br />
community of enquiry that is as inclusive as is earnestly practicable. In such a learning environment<br />
teachers characteristically seek to uncover students’ real potentials, and to acknowledge the manifest<br />
plurality of the human condition. This entails further that teachers, as far as possible, need to become<br />
imaginative authors of their own work and discerning, co-operative critics of their own practice. The<br />
kind of orientation for a practitioner ethic that comes to light here distinguishes teachers from a<br />
workforce whose actions are mainly dictated by conformity with unquestioned routine or with<br />
imposed directives. Equally, this ethical orientation distinguishes practitioners’ actions from workplace<br />
cultures that are marked largely by negativity or resistance where proposals for renewing and<br />
enhancing the practice are concerned. In such learning environments, moreover, students are<br />
encouraged and helped to become more fluent, more capable, more active and more responsible<br />
participants in their own learning. The quality of educational experience in such environments<br />
contributes crucially to enhancing the students’ human capacities and to discovering continually<br />
new aspects of their own identity.<br />
SHIFTING PERSPECTIVE:<br />
AN INTERPLAY AS DISTINCT FROM A TRANSMISSION<br />
It is worth taking stock briefly of the path taken to this point, while also anticipating a few turns<br />
that lie ahead. Adequately understood, teaching and learning in formal education have a higher<br />
purpose and responsibility than meeting a society’s demands for economic and social skills. It is not<br />
that the latter are unimportant. However, anything called a social or economic skill is itself properly<br />
nurtured in a healthy learning environment; i.e. focused on the disclosure and cultivation of<br />
capabilities that are linked to a personal sense of identity and enablement. To speak of capabilities in<br />
— 6 —