Towards a Better Future
A Review of the Irish School System John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
A Review of the Irish School System
John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Towards</strong> a <strong>Better</strong> <strong>Future</strong>: A Review of the Irish School System<br />
countries, the range and quality of out-of-school educational activities in Ireland compares more than<br />
favourably with those provided at much higher public cost in other jurisdictions.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
This chapter has outlined curriculum policy in primary and second-level schools since publiclyfunded<br />
schooling was first provided in Ireland in the nineteenth century. It has traced the<br />
development of the curriculum at primary and second level through the generations, identifying how<br />
the curriculum was used at various times to achieve political, cultural, religious and economic aims.<br />
It traced the changes at primary level from a prescriptive, exam-led curriculum (from 1871 to 1900 and<br />
from the mid-1920s to the late 1960s) to a more child-centred, discovery-based curriculum (from 1900<br />
to 1922 and from 1971 to date). It referred to the changing role of the primary teacher from that of a<br />
purveyor of knowledge to that of a guide and a facilitator of learning. It recognised that at primary level,<br />
in spite of the many demands on teachers and school principals, especially those in schools where the<br />
principal teaches on a full-time or almost full-time basis, there has been a long tradition of school-based<br />
curriculum planning. Both the 1971 and the 1999 primary curriculum were designed to encourage<br />
school-based curriculum planning. The curriculum designers in the Department of Education in 1971<br />
recognised that teachers would require support and guidance to develop and implement the curriculum<br />
– and the Teachers’ Handbook and ongoing in-service courses provided that guidance and support. The<br />
revised primary curriculum of 1999 provided guidelines that are even more extensive and exemplars<br />
for teachers. Given the many other demands facing principals and teachers, not least their heavy teaching<br />
timetables, it was recognised that there would be limitations to the extent to which practising teachers<br />
could be curriculum developers and innovators.<br />
The documentation which the DES has made available for the new Primary Language Curriculum<br />
appears to have achieved a reasonable balance, providing as it does, a practical ‘Toolkit’ which encompasses<br />
learning outcomes, progression continua, support material for teachers and examples of children’s<br />
learning and development. The web portal provides opportunities for sharing lesson plans and exemplars.<br />
While the richness and potential of the web is recognised, the importance of ensuring that no teacher<br />
or pupil is excluded from accessing the curriculum because of inability to access the web is also<br />
recognised by making all materials available in hard copy and/or on a USB stick. It will continue to be<br />
necessary to provide alternatives to web-based resources for as long as broadband coverage in Ireland is<br />
inadequate, to ensure the widest possible engagement by teachers and pupils.<br />
Curriculum development at second level is also traced in this chapter, and various efforts at Junior<br />
Cycle reform since the ICE report of 1974 are identified, in particular the efforts of the (Interim)<br />
CEB between 1984 and 1987 as well as the NCCA from 1988 to the present day. The attachment<br />
— 54 —