Towards a Better Future
A Review of the Irish School System John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
A Review of the Irish School System
John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Towards</strong> a <strong>Better</strong> <strong>Future</strong>: A Review of the Irish School System<br />
programme in education. With regard to governance and administrative structures, it has been a<br />
striking feature of the school system that there is no intermediate tier of administration between the<br />
Department of Education and Skills and the individual school, albeit the ETBI fulfils some such role<br />
for about 35% of post-primary schools (254/735). Over the last forty years, a number of attempts<br />
were made to establish such a middle tier, without success. The lack of such a tier places a heavy<br />
burden on the administration of individual schools. Many of the changes envisaged in current plans<br />
for the conduct of schools emphasise school planning, school self-evaluation and school communities<br />
working in collaborative, collegial ways. In line with international trends, significant emphasis is<br />
being placed, in Ireland, on the quality of<br />
educational leadership. Within that, the emphasis<br />
“<br />
is being particularly placed on the leadership of<br />
the core functions of the school – teaching and<br />
learning. However, Ireland has inherited an<br />
older model of school leadership, whereby the<br />
principal and deputy principal (if one exists)<br />
carry forward a multiplicity of duties that<br />
seriously impede close engagement with the<br />
leadership of teaching and learning. The duties<br />
involve relationships with parents, pupils, staff,<br />
procurement, maintenance of premises,<br />
relationships with the DES, examination<br />
agencies etc., and a great deal of bureaucratic<br />
activity. As referenced repeatedly in the<br />
In line with international trends,<br />
significant emphasis is being<br />
placed, in Ireland, on the<br />
quality of educational<br />
leadership. Within that, the<br />
emphasis is being particularly<br />
placed on the leadership of the<br />
core functions of the school –<br />
teaching and learning.<br />
”<br />
preceding chapters, this exerts a huge clogging influence on the work of real educational leadership.<br />
Many school leaders experience great stress in coping with this very varied and burdensome<br />
workload. Indeed, there is evidence that the post of principal is not now attractive to many highquality<br />
teachers, who see it as an unwelcome distraction from their core educational interests.<br />
However it is achieved, remedy is needed in this area and in the characterisation of responsibility<br />
posts in schools, if the aspired-for quality of educational leadership is to be realised.<br />
Another legacy issue from the past is the question of what a teacher’s contract entails. Irish teachers<br />
have a very good record in devoting voluntary time to school cultural events and sports. However,<br />
increasingly, the teacher’s contract is being interpreted as his/her allocated teaching hours in the<br />
school. This tends to fragment teachers’ sense of professional identity, leading to internal tensions<br />
and incoherences. An unfortunate, but by no means an infrequent, consequence is that principals<br />
seeking to involve staff in school activities such as school planning, collaborative subject teaching,<br />
school self-evaluation activities etc. can be faced with significant obstacles in co-operation. The socalled<br />
“Croke Park hours” were an attempt to establish the time for such planning activities, but they<br />
— 184 —