Towards a Better Future
A Review of the Irish School System John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
A Review of the Irish School System
John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Towards</strong> a <strong>Better</strong> <strong>Future</strong>: A Review of the Irish School System<br />
inspections, a wide range of inspection models is now in operation. Models include short,<br />
unannounced, one-day inspections, subject-focussed inspections, curriculum evaluations, programme<br />
evaluations and specialised inspections as, for instance, in disadvantaged schools or special needs<br />
provision. A key value of the range of models of inspection is that a particular inspection can be<br />
tailored more closely to needs. A major new development has been the introduction of ‘follow<br />
through’ inspections whereby, after a period of time, inspectors return to check on and discuss<br />
progress made by the school community in light of the earlier inspections and recommendations.<br />
Progress is recorded as ‘very good’, ‘good’, ‘partial’ or ‘no progress’. Where schools are found to have<br />
serious weaknesses, a co-ordinated approach is adopted within the Department to effect remediation,<br />
with continued inspectoral involvement. A further innovative practice has been the issuing of<br />
confidential appraisal questionnaires to parents and students on their experiences and perceptions<br />
of the work of schools. Teachers’ views on the running of schools are accessed through interviews<br />
or questionnaires. Post-inspection surveys of primary and post-primary teachers and principals, as<br />
well as of chairpersons of boards of management and parent associations on WSE evaluations in the<br />
most recent period – September 2015 to January 2016, are very positive, particularly from the<br />
primary personnel (Hislop, 2016).<br />
Overall, one detects a comprehensive, professional approach to inspection in contemporary practice.<br />
An extensive process of consultation is engaged in before forms and processes of inspection are<br />
finalised. A good development from previous practice is greater advance preparation by inspectors<br />
in gathering data on the school’s circumstances and context. This reduces the workload for school<br />
personnel in preparing documentation or data, but it also helps equip the Inspectorate to carry out<br />
its declared intention of bearing issues pertaining to the school’s context very much in mind when<br />
evaluating practice. The fact that guidelines and criteria of inspection are available to school personnel<br />
in advance also facilitates communication and dialogue. The feedback from questionnaires is carefully<br />
noted and feeds into refining strategy and approaches. Following inspection, schools are given oral<br />
feedback and they are allowed to respond and proffer factual corrections before reports are finalised<br />
for publication. There is also provision for schools to submit appeals on evaluations.<br />
The declared core approach of the Inspectorate is ‘inspection for improvement.’ The Inspectorate<br />
in Ireland does not favour league-table-type grading of schools, realising that this is a very blunt<br />
approach and ignores many relevant contextual issues in school appraisal. The Inspectorate aims to<br />
operate a co-professional approach with teachers, urging collaboration and collegiality, based on<br />
mutual respect of roles. This co-professional approach is a recognition of the quality of the teaching<br />
force, many of whose members possess post-graduate qualifications. This co-professional approach<br />
is also in alignment with the Teaching Council’s rationale for teacher education in its policy on<br />
teacher education as a continuum. The sense of openness and transparency is aimed at fostering a<br />
positive approach by school communities, with the work of the Inspectorate being viewed as an aid<br />
to school improvement, and a sense of ownership cultivated in the process. A key objective in the<br />
— 140 —