Towards a Better Future
A Review of the Irish School System John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
A Review of the Irish School System
John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Towards</strong> a <strong>Better</strong> <strong>Future</strong>: A Review of the Irish School System<br />
year developmental phase, Cosán allows for opportunities to concentrate minds on strategic matters.<br />
To the fore in such matters must be a careful thinking-through of the range of features necessary to<br />
make the framework a practicable and a fruitful one when it comes to implementation. What follows<br />
here is an attempt to engage constructively in such thinking-through. In this attempt, a number of<br />
headings are considered in turn.<br />
(a) A professional development spectrum<br />
At one end of such a spectrum might lie the<br />
minimum requirements for the amount of<br />
professional development teachers might be<br />
required to undertake over a given period to<br />
renew their registration. At the other end of the<br />
spectrum might lie the kinds of requirements<br />
that enable teachers to accomplish advanced<br />
levels of professional standing. While the former<br />
requirements would be obligatory for all<br />
registered teachers, the latter would be optional<br />
– viz. identifying professional development<br />
routes that teachers might elect to follow in<br />
pursuing such advanced standing. The kinds of<br />
courses needed to cater to this spectrum range<br />
from short courses provided under the auspices<br />
“<br />
Designing a flexible career<br />
enhancement structure, a<br />
readily-understandable creditweighting<br />
system and a credible<br />
system of equivalences for such<br />
a spectrum is a necessary task to<br />
carry out in moving toward a<br />
fully-fledged framework for<br />
professional learning.<br />
”<br />
of PDST or other national support agencies, to locally-organised courses that are submitted for<br />
accreditation through the Education Centres, to university-linked courses in the Education Centres,<br />
to Post-graduate Diplomas or M.Ed. degrees or indeed professional doctorates in the universities<br />
themselves. Designing a flexible career enhancement structure, a readily-understandable creditweighting<br />
system and a credible system of equivalences for such a spectrum is a necessary task to<br />
carry out in moving toward a fully-fledged framework for professional learning.<br />
(b) Accreditation of professional development<br />
The references under the previous heading to minimum requirements for renewal of registration,<br />
and to more advanced levels of professional accomplishment, point to an important conclusion: an<br />
accreditation system is an inescapable element of a framework for professional learning. In keeping<br />
with the values underlying Cosán, such an accreditation system would need to be a flexible one,<br />
recognising the kinds of autonomy and the degrees of autonomy that are inherent to teaching as a<br />
practice. It would also need to be an easily understood and transparent one. Developments in recent<br />
decades in the accreditation of prior learning (APL) and in the modularisation of study courses<br />
make the design of an accreditation system a much less daunting task than it would previously have<br />
been. It is now a common practice to recognise modules at different levels (i.e. quality) and to<br />
— 160 —