Towards a Better Future
A Review of the Irish School System John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
A Review of the Irish School System
John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Towards</strong> a <strong>Better</strong> <strong>Future</strong>: A Review of the Irish School System<br />
of teachers’ practices in conjunction with their annual conferences. In addition, reports by the<br />
Inspectorate provide valuable data on the implementation of policy across the system. Evidence<br />
based on a range of standardised tests of achievement confirm that the standards in Reading Literacy,<br />
Mathematics and Science in Irish primary schools compare favourably with their international<br />
counterparts, consistently scoring at or above the international averages. However, pupils tend to<br />
underperform at the higher levels.<br />
It is reported that a significant number of the primary school classes inspected have deficiencies in<br />
the implementation of assessment policy, and it is shown that in over three quarters of these classes<br />
unsatisfactory pupil outcomes were also noted. This vividly illustrates the interrelationship between<br />
teaching, learning and assessment so that where one component is found to be unsatisfactory the<br />
probability is that all three are problematic. We are informed, on the basis of follow-up inspectors’<br />
reports, that these deficiencies have now been rectified. We are, however, largely dependent on<br />
inspectors’ reports on the functioning of assessment policy in schools. Apart from some small-scale<br />
research, much of which is conducted by post-graduate students, there is a notable dearth of more<br />
extended long-range, detailed investigations into the practices engaged by teachers in schools. Such<br />
research can provide examples of good practice that can be shared more widely, as well as issues<br />
surrounding implementation. The need for continuous upgrading of teachers’ skills on all aspects of<br />
conducting assessments, as emphasised both in inspectors’ reports and by the INTO, is also essential<br />
in order to ensure that the teachers are adequately supported in this crucial area of curriculum<br />
development and implementation.<br />
Different challenges and opportunities arise at<br />
post-primary level. The demands of the terminal<br />
examination at the end of the Junior Cycle have<br />
understandably, if unfortunately, to a large degree<br />
influenced the range of assessments in use at this<br />
level. Inspectors’ reports would indicate that the<br />
main techniques in operation include various<br />
tests, largely influenced by the techniques used<br />
in the state examination, and administered at<br />
various stages throughout the year, at the end of<br />
a section of a programme, at the end of term and<br />
“<br />
It is now generally<br />
accepted that the Junior<br />
Certificate examination in<br />
its current form no longer<br />
serves the curriculum.<br />
”<br />
at the end of the year. Standardised tests of achievement are also administered as part of the PISA<br />
international surveys of attainment.<br />
It is now generally accepted that the Junior Certificate examination in its current form no longer<br />
serves the curriculum. Moreover, it has also been generally acknowledged, as far back as the ICE<br />
report of 1975, that this is not a high-stakes examination as very few, if any, critical decisions are made<br />
— 80 —