Towards a Better Future
A Review of the Irish School System John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
A Review of the Irish School System
John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Towards</strong> a <strong>Better</strong> <strong>Future</strong>: A Review of the Irish School System<br />
THE BACKGROUND<br />
The abolition of the Primary Certificate in 1967 and the introduction of a new primary<br />
curriculum in 1971 opened the way for a different quality of educational experience in Ireland’s<br />
primary schools; different both from the official ‘cultural nationalist’ emphasis that had prevailed<br />
in the era since independence and the ‘traditional didactic’ emphasis of the era before<br />
independence. The 1971 curriculum was largely devised by the Inspectorate of the Department<br />
of Education. Not all primary teachers embraced at once its central idea that children were to<br />
become more active participants in their own learning. By the time the revised primary<br />
curriculum of 1999 was in preparation, however, Ireland’s primary teachers had in the main<br />
become practitioners of more experiential forms of teaching and learning. The ultimate authors<br />
of the 1999 curriculum could be said to be primary teachers themselves, through their heavy<br />
representation on the syllabus committees of the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment<br />
(NCCA) that produced the draft curricula for approval by the Minister for Education. As the<br />
appendices for the curriculum handbooks show, moreover, almost all of the committees were<br />
chaired by primary teachers (Department of Education, 1999). The advisory and support services<br />
for the 1999 curriculum were also very largely staffed by primary teachers. This historic shift of<br />
emphasis at primary level from exam-led teaching to a focus on the quality of the students’<br />
educational experiences is not, however, a fully-accomplished project. Perhaps it can never be. As<br />
will be reviewed later, work remains to be done on enhancing teachers’ professional capacities in<br />
a number of respects to promote such higher quality educational experience among students.<br />
It can fairly be said that the major shift that has<br />
taken place in the cultures of teaching and<br />
learning at primary level has not been mirrored at<br />
post-primary level. That is not to say that there<br />
have not been serious efforts to bring about such<br />
a shift (see Chapters 3, 4 and 5 of this review). In<br />
launching the Junior Certificate programme in<br />
September 1988, the then Minister for Education,<br />
Mary O’Rourke, voiced her anticipation that the<br />
kinds of educational experiences which were<br />
now a central feature of primary education would<br />
follow through into second-level. There are many<br />
“<br />
It can fairly be said that<br />
the major shift that has taken<br />
place in the cultures of<br />
teaching and learning at<br />
primary level has not been<br />
mirrored at post-primary level.<br />
”<br />
reasons why this did not happen and these are reviewed in Chapters 3 and 4. Chief among these<br />
reasons has been a reluctance among post-primary teachers over more than three decades to accept<br />
changes in curriculum and assessment that would give them a role in assessing the work of their own<br />
students for certification purposes.<br />
— 2 —