01.03.2017 Views

Towards a Better Future

A Review of the Irish School System John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness

A Review of the Irish School System
John Coolahan | Sheelagh Drudy Pádraig Hogan | Áine Hyland | Séamus McGuinness

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Towards</strong> a <strong>Better</strong> <strong>Future</strong>: A Review of the Irish School System<br />

THE BACKGROUND<br />

The abolition of the Primary Certificate in 1967 and the introduction of a new primary<br />

curriculum in 1971 opened the way for a different quality of educational experience in Ireland’s<br />

primary schools; different both from the official ‘cultural nationalist’ emphasis that had prevailed<br />

in the era since independence and the ‘traditional didactic’ emphasis of the era before<br />

independence. The 1971 curriculum was largely devised by the Inspectorate of the Department<br />

of Education. Not all primary teachers embraced at once its central idea that children were to<br />

become more active participants in their own learning. By the time the revised primary<br />

curriculum of 1999 was in preparation, however, Ireland’s primary teachers had in the main<br />

become practitioners of more experiential forms of teaching and learning. The ultimate authors<br />

of the 1999 curriculum could be said to be primary teachers themselves, through their heavy<br />

representation on the syllabus committees of the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment<br />

(NCCA) that produced the draft curricula for approval by the Minister for Education. As the<br />

appendices for the curriculum handbooks show, moreover, almost all of the committees were<br />

chaired by primary teachers (Department of Education, 1999). The advisory and support services<br />

for the 1999 curriculum were also very largely staffed by primary teachers. This historic shift of<br />

emphasis at primary level from exam-led teaching to a focus on the quality of the students’<br />

educational experiences is not, however, a fully-accomplished project. Perhaps it can never be. As<br />

will be reviewed later, work remains to be done on enhancing teachers’ professional capacities in<br />

a number of respects to promote such higher quality educational experience among students.<br />

It can fairly be said that the major shift that has<br />

taken place in the cultures of teaching and<br />

learning at primary level has not been mirrored at<br />

post-primary level. That is not to say that there<br />

have not been serious efforts to bring about such<br />

a shift (see Chapters 3, 4 and 5 of this review). In<br />

launching the Junior Certificate programme in<br />

September 1988, the then Minister for Education,<br />

Mary O’Rourke, voiced her anticipation that the<br />

kinds of educational experiences which were<br />

now a central feature of primary education would<br />

follow through into second-level. There are many<br />

“<br />

It can fairly be said that<br />

the major shift that has taken<br />

place in the cultures of<br />

teaching and learning at<br />

primary level has not been<br />

mirrored at post-primary level.<br />

”<br />

reasons why this did not happen and these are reviewed in Chapters 3 and 4. Chief among these<br />

reasons has been a reluctance among post-primary teachers over more than three decades to accept<br />

changes in curriculum and assessment that would give them a role in assessing the work of their own<br />

students for certification purposes.<br />

— 2 —

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!